Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gman: ...we're going to attack the issue [of LT]


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Guest Lasus83
ATL drafted defensively just to beat the Panthers. We need to draft\FA offensively to counter that.


Agree...

We have been doing this, too, for a long time.

I remember TD getting drafted specifically to stop Mike Vick from running all over us... they called it the "Joker" position.

Dude just spied Vick all the time.

God I hated Vick.



Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, arbnranger said:

I hear ya Red, but c'mon with us to 2017. 

"Keep your nose in the wind and your eyes along the skyline" 

We don't know what the 2016 season will mean long term.

Other teams have the means of improving too. See the Atlanta Falcons.

Our core is only getting older. Luke just got his second concussion in 2 seasons. Thomas Davis certainly isn't getting younger. We do not have the luxury of casually dismissing a lost season due to simple inaction as inconsequential.

Of course I'm hopeful for 2017, and I think we can make strides. But there are no free passes for failure here. Newton, KB, Shula, Rivera have all been blamed for their roles. Our GM is not above reproach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lasus83
I watch football games, I don't put much stock into PFF.


Orly?

What was your job title again?

... cus im willing to bet that every single person on this forum has no more affiliation with profootball than they do with the Russian space program.

We are all just fans who care about this team, we are all amatures, but we are all, also, more committed than the average fan... because the average NFL fan is not on a team forum talking about the offseason in late January.

You may have watch extensive film on Reiff to determine that he is not a scheme fit for us, or was a product of being in a good system, or was overrated by PFF because they didn't factor in poor hand placement/ bad back pedal or some other such thing...

But I doubt it.

And I can't disagree that PFF is not a nfl bible. Because Oher was the 2nd worst rated LT (second to bell) before coming to us... and then was servicable and healthy.

...

What I do know is:

We need an answer at LT

We need that answer to remain healthy on our team.

Reiff may not be a great LT but he is really good at staying healthy. He is young. He has played as a starter in the NFL. And, above all, he will likely be available.

Do you take injury-bug Kalil or Oher over him?

Do you place any unproven rookie in this class?

Who is going to trade away a top tier LT?

A lot of people say Joe Thomas... have you seen his 90 million dollar contract? He is turning 33 and will cost a pick or player to get... assuming the browns will move him.

We are hurting at LT and should have fixed this problem already...

But we have not... and we are stuck in a bad situation.

All I am saying is that Reiff is the best of a bad situation.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Multiple NFL franchises put stock into PFF. It's not perfect, but nothing is. It's just one of the tools used, and more and more teams are seeing its value.

I hope we don't. The guys who run PFF are just a few football fans who are data analysts. They aren't football people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...