Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Summer 2017 Transfer Season


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Wenger is back!  Two year deal.

Rumor is they are trying to resign Alexis and Ozil. 

Arsenal scheduled to lose only £15M-£20M by missing out on CL. (Will make profit if win UEFA).

Mahrez put in transfer request. Spurs look likely to get raided this offseason.  Both Rose and Walker likely to leave and few others to follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

City might sign all of their targets on the first day 0_o

Bernardo Silva looks like a great eventual replacement for Silva and great depth considering how much our attack suffered after a few injuries last season. GK Ederson has a cannon for a leg and anything is an upgrade over Bravo. City also linked with Monaco's Mendy who would fill a need at fullback. If we get all of those and sign Walker I think City could do serious damage in all competitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherphan96 said:

City might sign all of their targets on the first day 0_o

Bernardo Silva looks like a great eventual replacement for Silva and great depth considering how much our attack suffered after a few injuries last season. GK Ederson has a cannon for a leg and anything is an upgrade over Bravo. City also linked with Monaco's Mendy who would fill a need at fullback. If we get all of those and sign Walker I think City could do serious damage in all competitions.

Well, I would think so, considering your guys spent more than anyone else over the past five seasons on players. Eventually, you have to hit some pay-dirt, right?

 

(Seriously though, how in the hell does spending £400 million+ over that time frame fall into FFP rules? I know your revenues are huge, but still.. that's a lot just for the buying of players, especially when half of your income goes to player wages alone).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Raskle said:

Well, I would think so, considering your guys spent more than anyone else over the past five seasons on players. Eventually, you have to hit some pay-dirt, right?

 

(Seriously though, how in the hell does spending £400 million+ over that time frame fall into FFP rules? I know your revenues are huge, but still.. that's a lot just for the buying of players, especially when half of your income goes to player wages alone).

I can't defend it but I'm hoping we start spending the $$$ with purpose and getting guys that fit Pep's system instead of our old system of just splurging on players who underperform and then get sold at like a 20 million loss a couple years later.

I'm mostly hopeful that if we are gonna overpay for players at least they are upstart young talents like Gabriel Jesus and Sane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Likely purchases

- Mbappe ST

- De Gea GK

- T. Hernandez LB 

 

Promoted to the first team

- Vallejo CB

- M. Llorente CDM

 

Departures

- Morata ST

- James CAM

- Coentrao LB

 

Let's do this repeat and go for three next season!

Rotoworld says De Gea is not going anywhere so you can scratch that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

That's up to De Gea. If he wants to go, he'll go. United can't keep him. Madrid is home and Real is a team with a far brighter future.

If he doesn't, fantastic! I want Donnarumma instead.

Mmmnnn, he's under contract with United.  Yea, they can keep him and he will play.  He also was average at best last year so I'm not sure why you would want him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

You actually think that matters? If Mourinho can't convince him to stay, De Gea is gone.

Like I said above, I want Donnarumma.

It does matter... called contract.  Madrid was buying him every year for the past 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Dude, we've bought players that were under contract before. You act as if we haven't lol

The team must be willing to sale.  ManU is  not other teams...  they got more money than Madrid.  They can do whatever they want.  If team is not willing to sale and player under contract... poo out of luck.  See Suarez at Liverpool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Yeah, I've heard that song and dance before. Yet we got Ronaldo. All the money in the world didn't matter apparently. 

I don't care what Manchester United has. It's not even about money at this point and you know it. Madrid is home to him. In addition, Real has a superior squad and long term future. United just qualified for Champions League. Real has won two titles in three years. It's a no brainer.

Most players will choose to go to Madrid or Barcelona if given the option. 

There is more money in EPL.  Even players like Pogba become average in EPL.  See...  you make more money in EPL than CL or La Liga.  Arsenal is losing just 15m pounds by missing CL.  Its nothing to them.  EPL make their money from EPL TV deals and Advertising.  You know why?  Because USA loves EPL.  EPL teams want to make CL because its extra 25M pounds in TV deals...  thats it...  They don't care for winning it.  You know why?  Because Quarter Final to Finalist only make 12m pounds....  That's it!  Teams more focused in making top 4 so they can make CL then care about winning CL.

For crying out load, your team had to beg Manchester City owner for money to fix up the stadium.

  •  Most players will choose to go to Madrid or Barcelona if given the option.

Players go to Real and Barcelona because of higher salaries and lower taxes.  That's why Spain is sucking on Germany cash titty and piss broke.  Look who's been in tax fraud scandals over the last few years?  Almost everyone from Spain.  Coincidence?  I think not.  Also, Pogba picked United over Real last year, it was all over TV.  Why?  More money. 

 

United might get rid of De Gea cause he fuging sucked last year but if they want to keep them, they will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

You're worse than the SEC blowhards and Dallas Cowboy fans hanging on the 'America's Team' mantra. The EPL can claim the revenue but La Liga and Bundesliga will claim the hardware. Man U in terms of value didn't outdo Real by much either. 3.5 billion to 3.3 billion. 

If the Champion's League wasn't important to the EPL then teams like United wouldn't try to qualify each year... yet they do. Why? Because it's the ultimate tournament and trophy in Europe. You're an Arsenal fan. Of course you're just saying otherwise because your front office can't assemble a team strong enough to beat the third best squad in our league.

Please continue to brag about that. Odds are you're alone because in virtually every forum, fans want a Champion's League title. EPL teams, however, can't even beat a team like Seville or Valencia. What a joke. You can drop the act.

I can tell you right now the EPL better step up because Serie A is improving and they've already sent two squads to the tournament.

Don't make it seem like United will part ways with De Gea because it was their choice. That's laughable and petty. David will leave because he wishes to go home and be on a squad that has a winning culture. If United truly think he's average, they'd let him go without a fight. To claim anything else is just asinine.

Seems like you completely lack understanding of money, contracts, cash flow and many other aspects of soccer business.

Real Madrid been trying to get De Gea for 3 years...  For 3 years they failed.  For 3 years De Gea tried to leave United and ended up signing a new deal with them.  Yet, you telling me... If De Gea wants to leave, he would...  Are you that clueless about front office business?  The only way De Gea will leave, if United wants him to leave otherwise, he will be playing for United like he did for the other 3 years. Jeez dude, its not a fuging rocket science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

You're worse than the SEC blowhards and Dallas Cowboy fans hanging on the 'America's Team' mantra. The EPL can claim the revenue but La Liga and Bundesliga will claim the hardware. Man U in terms of value didn't outdo Real by much either. 3.5 billion to 3.3 billion. 

If the Champion's League wasn't important to the EPL then teams like United wouldn't try to qualify each year... yet they do. Why? Because it's the ultimate tournament and trophy in Europe. You're an Arsenal fan. Of course you're just saying otherwise because your front office can't assemble a team strong enough to beat the third best squad in our league.

Please continue to brag about that. Odds are you're alone because in virtually every forum, fans want a Champion's League title. EPL teams, however, can't even beat a team like Seville or Valencia. What a joke. You can drop the act.

I can tell you right now the EPL better step up because Serie A is improving and they've already sent two squads to the tournament. At the moment, you guys are on par with Ligue 1.

Don't make it seem like United will part ways with De Gea because it was their choice. That's laughable and petty. David will leave because he wishes to go home and be on a squad that has a winning culture. If United truly think he's average, they'd let him go without a fight. To claim anything else is just asinine.

La Liga and Bundesliga are extremely top heavy. Real, Barca, Bayern are the best teams in the world so they have the hardware but PL has far more parity and thus is much more interesting to watch.

Think Juve will beat Real in the Final. That defense is outstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Don't bullpoo. If it weren't for a last second dirty tactic, De Gea would be here. It's United so I'm not surprised - still fuming over Ronaldo picking us. Either way, I suggest you start practicing your 'shocked' excuse if he does come back home this summer. It's not quantum mechanics. If it was such a sure thing, then United wouldn't be looking for GKs at the moment. 

United have a goalie at the moment who played way better than De Gea...  again.  De Gea sucked ass last year.  Also, go google contracts and educate yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow, didn't catch that!  I don't think Chuba's a power back either but he's usually good at getting that 1 or 2 yards. That was an uncharacteristic day for him.
    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30   Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
×
×
  • Create New...