Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vic Beasley says to let Cam be Cam


truthjuice

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam in 2016 played a lot like Cam in 2014, or 2012 for that matter.  2015 was his high water mark, and none of us should expect him to ever be that good.  I agree with Beasley, too.  It would be moronic for Rivera and Shula to make him into a pocket passer.  Cam is what he is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Letting cam be cam sounds good, especially if you want him to have a earlier exit from the NFL. 

I've stated this from pretty much day 1 that cam needs to develop into a pocket passer in the image of big ben, he has the talent to be every bit as good as ben or better(big ben is easily a top 5 QB for the last 10 years).  he just needs someone to push him in the direction that will maximize his potintial and not incidentally place him at unnecessary risk.

I dont care who you are you cant have your QB doing 10 designed runs up the middle every game. the hits will pile up and he will eventually be less and less effective as a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...