Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interested in CB Channing Stribling


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

In one of the most athletic DB classes we've seen, DG is interested in the least athletic CB in the class:

https://3sigmaathlete.com/rankings/cb/

He's in the 0.7% among NFL CBs by pSPARQ.  I don't care how many interceptions he had last year - a percentile of 0.7% should make him undraftable.

And if you think athleticism doesn't matter at corner, go check out last year's pSPARQ ratings:

https://3sigmaathlete.com/rankings2016/cb/

Jalen Ramsey - 99.3%

Vernon Hargreaves - 97.3%

James Bradberry - 93.4%

Jalen Mills - 73.7%

Daryl Worley - 55.0% (being slightly above avg among NFL athletes is good)

Zach Sanchez - 21.5%

I'd say they were fairly predictive of on-field performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Makes sense. Fits what we look for. Big corner with limited speed that will probably knock him down the draft board for a lot of teams. But our zone scheme doesn't require a CB to be blazing fast.

Well said. That's why safety is key for our pass d. Getting Adams would be yuge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, uscgamecocks said:

In one of the most athletic DB classes we've seen, DG is interested in the least athletic CB in the class:

https://3sigmaathlete.com/rankings/cb/

He's in the 0.7% among NFL CBs by pSparq.  I don't care how many interceptions he had last year - a percentile of 0.7% should make him undraftable.

And if you think athleticism doesn't matter at corner, go check out last year's pSparq ratings:

https://3sigmaathlete.com/rankings2016/cb/

I'd say they were fairly predictive of on-field performance.

What was Norman's SPARQ score? I'm betting it was pretty low.

I'm betting that this is exactly why we're looking at him. He may fall a lot further down the board than a lot of the pundits think. If he does, we'll have done our homework on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What was Norman's SPARQ score? I'm betting it was pretty low.

I'm betting that this is exactly why we're looking at him. He may fall a lot further down the board than a lot of the pundits think. If he does, we'll have done our homework on him.

I get that we are going to do our homework, but 0.7% is really, really, really bad.  

The database I use doesn't show Norman's SPARQ (it doesn't go back that far).  Does anyone else have it?  It would be very interesting to know.

Anecdotally, Norman's combine results look incredibly similar to Daryl Worley's.  So I would guess that Norman tests as an NFL-average athlete - and his prepartion and anticipation make him into the all-pro CB that he is.

It's not just about athleticism - plenty of the top SPARQ guys go undrafted, and deservedly so.  I think athletic testing should be used to supplement the scouting process.  If a guy has good tape but is a 0.7% athlete?  That's a big red flag.  If a guy has great tape and is a 50-75% athlete?  He can probably keep doing it at the NFL level.  Great tape and a 93% score?  Draft that guy in the second round, even if he comes from a small school like Samford, because he's probably going to be a stud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:
Image result for channing stribling

Even his highlights aren't very impressive.  On at least two of his picks get got beat and was bailed out by a terrible underthrow.  Another pick was the result of a bad overthrow in the middle of the field.  One of his highlights was a PBU that resulted in a DPI flag.

Lance Zierlein saw the athleticism as an issue in reviewing his game tape:

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/profiles/channing-stribling?id=2557932

The Panthers FO clearly knows what they are doing, but that SPARQ score is a huge red flag in my opinion.  If we like him, I hope it's as a very late pick / UDFA pickup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key from the link you posted:

"There are defenses who will prefer Stribling's physical traits and ball skills, but he will be limited by scheme fit."

We like big CBs with great instincts and ball skills. Those types of guys thrive in our system. We're not going to ask the guy to line up opposite of Julio Jones and follow him everywhere he goes. That's not our scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...