Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Amazing breakdown of our visits


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Why? Everyone knows this is a bad OT class. I don't want us to reach. Too much potential at other positions to reach for an OT who isn't going to do much. We signed Kalil and Oher may be healthier than we know. I wouldn't mind taking a developmental guy who has starting potential, but that isn't going to be early. I watched the Senior Bowl and it sure as fug showed how bad some of the guys really were and those were guys who had been mocked in the 2nd/3rd before the Senior Bowl.

I feel you. We've been hearing this for the last 5-6 years, yet someone makes pro-bowl and all-pro every year. If you pull the trigger on one of these OT, I guarantee that they will be better than what you have on your roster now. If ALL of the OT's are that bad, then whey would anyone draft any of them. I'm just tired hearing that stupid line of how every year is a terrible OT class. It's getting old, seriously. Need I remind you of the Edmund Kugbila debacle? David Bakhtiari was picked one pick after good 'ole Kugbila. He made the pro-bowl from the '13 draft. I believe good 'ole DG(Doller General), was resposible. He's been using that lame ass line since then. Now, you all are repeating it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 15 said:

thank you for sharing this. this is something I've tried to explain to a lot of users on this forum. maybe I need to switch to reddit.

I love the format where you can downvote dumb comments.  It allows you to see the actual popular opinions and reduces the amount of poo-posts and trolls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, @bonafidebanter said:

Well, keep on getting low budget OT's. Keep getting UDFA OT's and see how that work out for ya.

About as well as drafting a guy high this year would, with the added bonus that we'd miss out on a good player at another spot.

Just because you draft someone with a high pick doesn't make them good. In fact, if you take someone with a high pick when they aren't worth it, you're actually making your team worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, @bonafidebanter said:

Well, keep on getting low budget OT's. Keep getting UDFA OT's and see how that work out for ya.

It seems it takes longer for OT's to achieve success in the NFL now. There are almost no left tackles coming into the league and playing well in their first year. So I think you have to consider even highly drafted OT's as projects, and be prepared to wait 2 or more years for them to start to play well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Marguide said:

It seems it takes longer for OT's to achieve success in the NFL now. There are almost no left tackles coming into the league and playing well in their first year. So I think you have to consider even highly drafted OT's as projects, and be prepared to wait 2 or more years for them to start to play well.

You also have to coach them up. There are still OL coaches in the NFL, right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

About as well as drafting a guy high this year would, with the added bonus that we'd miss out on a good player at another spot.

Just because you draft someone with a high pick doesn't make them good. In fact, if you take someone with a high pick when they aren't worth it, you're actually making your team worse.

You don't have to draft OT's high to get better than what the Panthers have on the roster now. I never said anything about drafting one high. Just draft one! Or two!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...