Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most realistic Panthers mock I've seen yet


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

NFL.com changed its comparison from Greg Olsen to Julius Thomas. After watching more from Howard, the guy is soft and only possesses straight line speed. He has limited agility, can't jump and shys away from contact. 

To me, Howard isn't a guy worthy of the 8th spot. 

Very interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:
Weaknesses

Will need more muscle and mass to be an in-line blocker as a pro. Appears passive. Doesn't have the field demeanor of most Alabama players. Needs better hand strength to sustain his blocks. Can do better job of working feet into position after contact. Needs urgency in his routes to tilt defenders and get them guessing. Needs to show more elusiveness after the catch. Saw playing time diminish from junior to senior season. Explosive talent who doesn't make enough explosive plays. Scheme creates some wide-open deep-ball catches at time. Scouts question his competitive nature.

Sources Tell Us

"Alabama recruited a shiny toy but (Lane) Kiffin never really knew what to do with it. I don't worry about the talent at all. He could be an all-pro. I just need to know if he loves football." -- NFC general manager

NFL Comparison

Julius Thomas

And I was referring to WR being the next logical move. Don't think there is one that merits the 8 overall pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Very interesting.

Cam wasn't worthy of a number 1 draft pick by some standards. Going by traditional standards and all. Eye test is all i need. Watching all bama games Howard stood out, but Nick is just not a pass man. Howards ability to block and show up in big moments is enough for me..he has all the physical traits...just because he wasn't aggressive doesn't mean he was not good..because if your not you do not play for Nick...The best thing I see about Howard is the one thing most knock him for and that is that he was under utilized. Who is aggressive when you know you are going to be limited..the best thing you can do is be good at what you are asked to do and when called upon to be the go to guy catch the fricking ball which is what I saw from Howard majority of the times. Passes the eye test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

That doesn't mean a damn thing. Shula had all this time to make changes to his scheme. He didn't. He's run the same system since he coached Alabama. TE #2 blocks. That's Shula. Drafting Howard won't make us a better offense. He'll just be Dickson (seeing 20-30 receptions) until Olsen retires. You guys are banking on phantom stories. Good luck.

It's not a myth. An interim OC beat him out for a head coaching gig.

You gotta have the horses.  Can't change the scheme up without the bodies. I mean you can...and just be worse. 

Name the roster Shula had where he wasted talent at the #2 TE spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On March 31, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Promethean Forerunner said:
Weaknesses

Will need more muscle and mass to be an in-line blocker as a pro. Appears passive. Doesn't have the field demeanor of most Alabama players. Needs better hand strength to sustain his blocks. Can do better job of working feet into position after contact. Needs urgency in his routes to tilt defenders and get them guessing. Needs to show more elusiveness after the catch. Saw playing time diminish from junior to senior season. Explosive talent who doesn't make enough explosive plays. Scheme creates some wide-open deep-ball catches at time. Scouts question his competitive nature.

Sources Tell Us

"Alabama recruited a shiny toy but (Lane) Kiffin never really knew what to do with it. I don't worry about the talent at all. He could be an all-pro. I just need to know if he loves football." -- NFC general manager

NFL Comparison

Julius Thomas

That's the thing. We're banking on hoping Howard will be good, even though his production says otherwise. I like his potential as an immediate starter, but I question why Bama chose not to use him as a threat unless there's another underlying reason for it.

To be fair, picking a TE top 10 is where the issue with value comes in. Look at the contracts TEs get nowadays, and compare that with a pass rusher's or something of that value.

Far more value long-term insuring you get a quality pass rusher or even a franchise runningback in comparison to a tight end. OJ Howard could be good, but that's too much of a 'could' for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In short, there's no value to take a TE in the top 10 when considering contract and money wise. 

Other positions will cost way more, but are crucial for any team in comparison to TE. TEs are undervalued because their market value is so low, not because of lack of understanding of their talent and impact.

Since this draft is super deep at TE, there's no point or value for taking Howard at 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

In short, there's no value to take a TE in the top 10 when considering contract and money wise. 

Other positions will cost way more, but are crucial for any team in comparison to TE. TEs are undervalued because their market value is so low, not because of lack of understanding of their talent and impact.

Since this draft is super deep at TE, there's no point or value for taking Howard at 8.

But you can't draft just considering positional value. If you think two players will have an equal impact on your team, say a TE vs a DE or LT, then yes, positional value comes into play. That is rarely the case. 

So say your TE candidate is someone you project to be a perennial all-pro, but your choices at DE or LT or QB you project as capable starters but nothing special, then you take the TE.

You wouldn't choose Cam Robinson, for example, over Fournette, even though LT has high positional value and the value for RB's is low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as a Tech fan, Jerod Evans would be a nice ass backup..

 

like his teamate in Tyrod, I could see him be a player here for us and get a chance elsewhere

 

 

 

speaking of which.. fug him for leaving this year. We are gunna be stacked.. He's gunna be a late round pick... Play another season and improve ya stock!! Ughh. Frustration

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

In short, there's no value to take a TE in the top 10 when considering contract and money wise. 

Other positions will cost way more, but are crucial for any team in comparison to TE. TEs are undervalued because their market value is so low, not because of lack of understanding of their talent and impact.

Since this draft is super deep at TE, there's no point or value for taking Howard at 8.

This argument also applies for RBs and safeties, no?

This is an unfortunate year to have a top 10 pick because many of the top talents are at non-premium positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...