Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers Are 'Open For Business' For #2 Pick

bobsfoodbasics

By bobsfoodbasics,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Nails Newbie

Nails

Posted
Posted

It wouldn't cost NEAR what the trade chart says since they are so desperate and any additional assets is better than none, but I'm still not sure.  Maybe 8, 40, and 64 for 2 and Tartt, if we ensure we get our man.  I don't want to give up a pick next year since we're already down one but maybe our 1st for their 2nd next year could be swapped since they'll likely only be a few spots away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted

Honestly, if we traded our entire draft this year and did not touch next years draft we would getting a bargain (it should cost us more).  It is stupid expensive and IMO would be for ONLY Garrett and personally I don't think he is worth it either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soul Rebel Experienced

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted

I wonder if it's SF putting rumors about the Browns wanting a QB at 1. I know Schefter reported it, but he said 1 NFL Exec said it, so what if it's SF saying it in order to entice more teams to consider it. 

The only player that I would pay a king's ransom for at #2 would be Garrett. I'd love Fournette, Adams or Hooker, but not for the pricetag it would cost. 

By the same token, the Browns always seem to go full Browns and f it up some how, so I also wouldn't be surprised if Cleveland drafts Trubisky or Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, rodeo said:

Combined with that report that Garrett may not go 1st overall, I would be happy with moving up. But not for Fournette.

If the Browns pull a Browns and pass on Garrett I'd love to get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Honestly, if we traded our entire draft this year and did not touch next years draft we would getting a bargain (it should cost us more).  It is stupid expensive and IMO would be for ONLY Garrett and personally I don't think he is worth it either.

8 this year and next year's first could get up to 2. I'd definitely consider that. Would be getting game changing best player in draft AND still have our 2nd rounders and comp pick to add solid depth or possible starters in this deep draft. Ideally would only be losing pick 32 next year too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

8 this year and next year's first could get up to 2. I'd definitely consider that. Would be getting game changing best player in draft AND still have our 2nd rounders and comp pick to add solid depth or possible starters in this deep draft. Ideally would only be losing pick 32 next year too.

Yeah, I hear you.  For Garrett its tasty but giving up next years one is risky as it gets.  Cannot imagine having Garrett here though.  Wow.  I would have to believe that SF would want very close to what Philly gave last year and that is just way too much.

I did notice an interesting stat:  Garrett had 8.5 sacks last yr but 4.5 came against UT San Antonio.  Feels like a sack master would have more production.  Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

8 this year and next year's first could get up to 2. I'd definitely consider that. Would be getting game changing best player in draft AND still have our 2nd rounders and comp pick to add solid depth or possible starters in this deep draft. Ideally would only be losing pick 32 next year too.

Not even close. First of all, next year's first is considered to equal a second this year. Go check the chart and you will see how far you are from reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nails Newbie

Nails

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Yeah, I hear you.  For Garrett its tasty but giving up next years one is risky as it gets.  Cannot imagine having Garrett here though.  Wow.  I would have to believe that SF would want very close to what Philly gave last year and that is just way too much.

I did notice an interesting stat:  Garrett had 8.5 sacks last yr but 4.5 came against UT San Antonio.  Feels like a sack master would have more production.  Just saying.

They're not getting what Philly gave up or even close.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
E CaT PanTHer 2 Newbie

E CaT PanTHer 2

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

8 this year and next year's first could get up to 2. I'd definitely consider that. Would be getting game changing best player in draft AND still have our 2nd rounders and comp pick to add solid depth or possible starters in this deep draft. Ideally would only be losing pick 32 next year too.

haha i like your thinking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • carpanfan96
      Official 2025 NHL Playoffs Thread

      By carpanfan96 · Posted

      That hit on Stolarz was dirty was fug. Just came in and gave him an elbow on purpose to the head. 
    • carpanfan96
      fuging sit Brent Burns

      By carpanfan96 · Posted

      Brindamour said this isn't the time of the year for making changes and therefore expect Nikishin to be a healthy scratch til at least two defenceman get injured. Yes I said two because ya don't make changes and there other guys on the roster who've played with the group in games. 
    • tukafan21
      T-Mac Jerseys?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol Honestly, it might sound dumb, but I've had this idea in my head of a specific picture I really want to get with him since draft night. Basically I want it to be of the two of us sitting on the floor next to each other with the picture from behind.  Ideally it would have been with us both wearing T-Mac jerseys (and me wearing an Arizona hat that has block A logo on the back of it too), but since they won't have baby versions of those for a bit and that does seem like a waste of money on something he'll grow out of in a few months, I think I'll go with this that I've found on Amazon for like 12 bucks........ I'll get this made with T-Mac's #4 but then my Nephew's first name (which incidentally starts with a T, so I've already joked to my sister that she needs to change his middle name to something with "Mc" or "Mac" in it so i can call him T-Mac lol) Just think that would make for a really cool picture for me to have of him at this age (just over 13 months now), with the two of us wearing our #4's.  It's the type of thing I can absolutely see myself getting it printed out by Shutterfly on one of those canvas like prints to hang on my wall. And seeing as they live in NYC with me in Michigan, not sure the next time I'll see him again as I can't just drive on down the street for a picture when the jersey arrives, so was hoping I'd be able to take advantage of seeing them at the end of the month to get this picture, but it would all be dependent on the jersey (and this custom onesie) being shipped in time.
×
×
  • Create New...