Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Netflix: Casting JonBenet

Doyle

By Doyle,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Doyle Collaborator

Doyle

Posted
Posted

This documentary was really creepy and disturbing.  It reminded me of Dear Zachary in that is was so good but you kinda wish you hadn't watched it afterwards.  I have to give a lot of credit to the director for coming up with such a unique idea.  Feel free to give your opinion on who did it but I don't know how anyone could have any doubt after watching this.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted

Yeah it's definitely a creepy story. I didn't realize they found dna evidence of an unidentified male in 2015. 

Elements of the ransom note seem forged. I also think it could have been an accident they tried to cover up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doyle Collaborator

Doyle

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

Yeah it's definitely a creepy story. I didn't realize they found dna evidence of an unidentified male in 2015. 

Elements of the ransom note seem forged. I also think it could have been an accident they tried to cover up.

Were you able to watch the documentary or are you just familiar with the case?   I think that the note was written by the mother and most likely with her non writing hand to try and conceal it.  It had to be either the son, father, or the mother. Since little kids are incapable of keeping a secret all of my money is on the mother.   It might have been an accident like you said but if so why cover it up?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted

I cant wait to see this as this case is fascinating.  I really hope they solve this as it is completely baffling to me.  I could argue family member then turn right back to intruder with equal question marks.  Horrifing case for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...