Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Knowing how all the pieces fell ~ Draft Redo


PrimeTimeHeel

Recommended Posts

Based on how things played out and with hindsight being 20/20 lets have fun with this...

1(8): O.J. Howard (TE)

2(40): Dalvin Cook (HB)

2(64): Curtis Samuel (WR) (only team to take a WR was Pitt @ 62.. and they took JuJu)

3(77):  Deashon Hall (DE) (Keeping trade in place as i don't see a player i would take between 77 and 98)

5(152): Will Holden (RT)

6(192): Jeremy Clark (CB) ( at 6'3 220 and solid tackler i would convert him to Safety)

7(233): Ben Boulware (LB) (debated Elijah Hood here.. but can't deny the intangebles of Boulware)

That's MY perfect draft based on how things fell.. getting Howard and Cook + a similar player in Samuel made the loss of CMac Manageable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TalonNC said:

Based on how things played out and with hindsight being 20/20 lets have fun with this...

1(8): O.J. Howard (TE)

2(40): Dalvin Cook (HB)

2(64): Curtis Samuel (WR) (only team to take a WR was Pitt @ 62.. and they took JuJu)

3(77):  Deashon Hall (DE) (Keeping trade in place as i don't see a player i would take between 77 and 98)

5(152): Will Holden (RT)

6(192): Jeremy Clark (CB) ( at 6'3 220 and solid tackler i would convert him to Safety)

7(233): Ben Boulware (LB) (debated Elijah Hood here.. but can't deny the intangebles of Boulware)

That's MY perfect draft based on how things fell.. getting Howard and Cook + a similar player in Samuel made the loss of CMac Manageable. 

Based on how things fell such as signing Boulware as a UDFA......  Let's take him in round 7!!!    

 

This poo is glitchy and forcing me to have a line underneath me words

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Based on how things fell such as signing Boulware as a UDFA......  Let's take him in round 7!!!    

 

This poo is glitchy and forcing me to have a line underneath me words

Yeah i thought about that after hitting submit... so I'm editing my post to take Hood. in the 7th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Based on how things fell such as signing Boulware as a UDFA......  Let's take him in round 7!!!    

 

This poo is glitchy and forcing me to have a line underneath me words

"Let's pay for something we got for free!"

Also, anybody who would take Howard over McCaffrey is excused from adult conversation. Because Howard was totally drafted 9th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

"Let's pay for something we got for free!"

Also, anybody who would take Howard over McCaffrey is excused from adult conversation. Because Howard was totally drafted 9th.

Always nice to critize without showing Your Redo....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TalonNC said:

Based on how things played out and with hindsight being 20/20 lets have fun with this...

1(8): O.J. Howard (TE)

2(40): Dalvin Cook (HB)

2(64): Curtis Samuel (WR) (only team to take a WR was Pitt @ 62.. and they took JuJu)

3(77):  Deashon Hall (DE) (Keeping trade in place as i don't see a player i would take between 77 and 98)

5(152): Will Holden (RT)

6(192): Jeremy Clark (CB) ( at 6'3 220 and solid tackler i would convert him to Safety)

7(233): Ben Boulware (LB) (debated Elijah Hood here.. but can't deny the intangebles of Boulware)

That's MY perfect draft based on how things fell.. getting Howard and Cook + a similar player in Samuel made the loss of CMac Manageable. 

Hmm I really like this one too except I would keep Armah in the 6th and Boulware already became ours as UDFA so the kicker could stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TalonNC said:

Always nice to critize without showing Your Redo....

Why would I, or anyone?

"I would take my first 2 picks WAYYY higher than anyone else!!"

If you wanna do that, just jump in the Wayback Machine and draft folks earllier than everybody.

Next 2 picks..."I'm good with them. They get back on my page".

We wanted Fournette or McCaffrey. Not Howard. Not Barnett. Not <insert random guy that I like, because I know more than everybody else>. We got a Round One guy, we went to Round Two. Move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...