Maclin or Decker?

[WarHeel]

Saw this debate on NFL.com and was curious what you guys think.

 

If you could add either gentleman to our roster, $$$ aside, which would it be and why?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

[Lilsmitty09]

Neither. 

[WarHeel]

Neither. 

Reading comprehension wasn't your thing in school, was it?


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

[LinvilleGorge]

Assuming both are healthy, I'd take Decker.

[caatfan]

I'd take Maclin. I think he's the more talented receiver. His stats are a little better too, despite missing 25% of last season with the groin injury.

[top dawg]

Maclin because he has more speed and is theoretically a better match with Cam's cannon arm. But don't get me wrong, I think he is the overall more complete receiver. 

We have enough possession guys.

[top dawg]

Hasn't Maclin been a return man before as well?

[WarHeel]

Hasn't Maclin been a return man before as well?

He was at Mizzou. Haven't followed him much in the NFL so not sure about that.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

[LinvilleGorge]

26 minutes ago, caatfan said:

I'd take Maclin. I think he's the more talented receiver. His stats are a little better too, despite missing 25% of last season with the groin injury.

Decker only appeared in 3 games last season and only received 8 targets as a rookie.

Plus, Decker has spent all but two seasons of his career with the likes of The Golden Calf of Bristol, Geno Smith, and Ryan Fitzpatrick throwing him the ball. Maclin has benefited from being in offenses that like to spread the defense out and throw the ball. If you compare Dejcer and Maclin in terms of the percentage of receiving yardage and TDs they accounted for in their offenses it wouldn't surprise me if Decker isn't significantly ahead.

[Ace_Aladdin]

29 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

 

Saw this debate on NFL.com and was curious what you guys think.

 

If you could add either gentleman to our roster, $$$ aside, which would it be and why?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

 

11 minutes ago, caatfan said:

I'd take Maclin. I think he's the more talented receiver. His stats are a little better too, despite missing 25% of last season with the groin injury.

 

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Assuming both are healthy, I'd take Decker.

There is no need for either one, we need a 2nd TE more so than another oversized WR. 

 

[LinvilleGorge]

11 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Hasn't Maclin been a return man before as well?

He's a very underwhelming punt teturner in the NFL. 100 career returns with a 6.7 yard average, no TDs, and most alarmingly a long of 27 yards.

Either way, I think we're going to see our 1st and 2nd round picks getting the bulk of the return duties.

[LinvilleGorge]

1 minute ago, sanjay_rajput said:

 

 

There is no need for either one, we need a 2nd TE more so than another oversized WR. 

 

Just stop it already with the #2 TE stuff. We're don't running two TEs as our base offense.

[Ace_Aladdin]

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just stop it already with the #2 TE stuff. We're don't running two TEs as our base offense.

I don't agree , based on Rivera's comment about usage of J-Stew and the running game we will see a lot of 2 TEs but he will be moved around the line and backfield playing FB role. 

[GoobyPls]

Maclin by far 

 

Decker is just another big body receiver