Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Available PGs - Who's coming to the QC?


davos

Recommended Posts

First off, a trade scenario could happen, and by the time I dissected the potential market, 50 moves will happen today so let me just roll out some quick copy and pastes.  

Here's a list of guys available as UFAs

Darren Collison (Age 29)

68 GP 
30.3 MIN 
13.2 PPG 
47.6 FG% 
2.2 RPG 
4.6 APG

George Hill (Age 31)

49 GP 31.5 MIN 16.9 PPG 47.7 FG% 3.4 RPG 4.2 APG 

 
       

Rajon Rondo (Age 31)

69
 GP 26.7 MIN 
7.8 PPG 
40.8 FG% 
5.1 RPG 
6.7 AST (I mean, it's Rondo!)

Aaron Brooks (Age 32)

65
 GP 13.8
 MIN 5.0 PPG 
40.3 FG% 
1.1 RPG 
1.9 AST (Washed up?)

Trey Burke (Age 24)

57 GP 12.3 MIN 5.0 PPG 45.5 FG% 0.8 RPG 1.8 APG (Averaged mid teens with Utah before being forced behind Wall in DC)

 
Tyler Ennis (Age 22)
       
22
 GP 17.8 MIN 
7.7 PPG 
45.1 FG% 
1.2 RPG 
2.4 APG (I have no opinion on this one)

Shelvin Mack (Age 27)

55 GP 
21.9 MIN 
7.8 PPG 
44.6 FG% 
2.3 RPG 
2.8 APG (Defensive type)

Michael Carter-Williams (Age 25)

45
 GP 18.8 MIN 
6.6 PPG 
36.6 FG% 
3.4 RPG 
2.5 APG (He had a massive down year shooting the ball) 

Beno Udrih (Age 34)

39 GP 
14.4 MIN 
5.8 PPG 
46.7 FG% 
1.5 RPG 
3.4 APG

 

Others: Derrick Rose, Brandon Jennings, Milos Teodosic (May be going to CHI), Ty Lawson (Ain't happening)

Here's the one kicker---Darren Williams. He knows he'll be going into a backup role again at this stage.  Shot 46% from the field for the Cavs and we all saw the playoff performance lol.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Out of that list Give me George Hill. It's a pipe dream though.

I have a feeling when the dust settles we will end up with someone like Raymond Felton.

He was the one guy I left off because, well, I think he's pretty much done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...