Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who should get the next statue - TD or 89 ?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

In your opinion, if the Panthers give out one statue does Thomas Davis deserve it or should it go to Steve Smith? 

 

Backup your answer with reasons less you get Poo's upon. 

89 obviously, HOF career.

TD's legacy is yet to be defined. (I dream of 58 holding the Lombardi over his head). This also would make a fine statue.

Prolouge: You have to realize TD is a 2 time Pro Bowler, period. His tenacity is incredible, but a statue will be sentimental as was Sam Mill's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If 89, 58 and 90 don't get statues I don't know who will.

If 89 played 2 more years in Carolina like Julius I'd say he deserved to go first because he was "the" guy for so many years and did soooooo much. Plus he'll have padded his stats to get ahead of some big names. Not to mention the possibility of a SB with a Panther super team.

His hilite reel is better than any other Panther alive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Snake said:

Right now I'm worried about some college kids tearing them down thinking Jerry is some kind of slave owner. 

What a weird imaginary fear. Turn off Fox for a few minutes and talk to some actual people. 

(Maybe if any of the statue subjects take up arms against the United States in a bloody rebellion in defense of the indefensible, their statue might be removed? That might be reasonable.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RetiredCollegeCoach said:

What a weird imaginary fear. Turn off Fox for a few minutes and talk to some actual people. 

(Maybe if any of the statue subjects take up arms against the United States in a bloody rebellion in defense of the indefensible, their statue might be removed? That might be reasonable.)

Not weird at all and it's on every channel, not just Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...