Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One cut day = bad football


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

The main justification of the old way was to give guys time to latch on somewhere else, but did that ever happen? If you can't make the top 75 of one team you probably aren't gonna be able to make the 53 of another team with only a week to prove yourself. I'd venture to say hopefuls probably prefer staying with one team throughout the pre-season, rather than clamoring for another opportunity in such a short window.

So personally I don't mind it, gives coaches more time with each player and thus should bring more informed decisions. The number of players hitting waivers will be crazy, but I doubt we will see many more claims than usual put in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change is good, that's 15 extra bodies to limit the use of starters, and key depth in the 4th meaningless pre-season game. All of these NFL staffs know who's cut by the time the 3rd game wraps up. It's not like they'll be sifting through 40 names today trying to figure out what to do. 

There may be some fringe battles, but it's not something that has changed the prior process internally most likely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of young QB's struggle with holding on to the ball top long. He has gotten better progressively in that regard. Pocket Time(in Sec):  2.5(2023), 2.3(2024), 2.2(2025) Time to Throw(in Sec): 2.9(2023), 2.79(2024), 2.82(2025) The divedends have been fairly small, is the issue.
    • I'm firing DC, though I think it actually makes the job less attractive. He's not prepared to be a HC and it's showed. A new HC is not going to be tied automatically to BY. He's going to want to bring in some level of competition in the QB room because anyone who has ever watched football knows our QB room is lacking. If he doesn't, that tells a more interesting tale of who's really calling the shots.  Dave hasn't been decisive enough in game and that leadership council BS has trust fall vibes. Our offense has been pathetically stale and vanilla. Our run game while good has made no sense based on who has been playing best. Our defense is improved but they can't be expected to hold opposing teams to below 17 a game because our offense can't score consistently.  We've beaten some teams we shouldn't have beaten, specifically GB and the Rams, and I think our record doesn’t accurately reflect where the team and the coaching really is. We've fallen flat against a geriatric rookie QB leading a 2-10 NO team and got our ass handed to us TWICE. We're unprepared for the biggest games.  This is what happens though when real coaching candidates turn down interviews because your owner is a narcissistic butthole. You get someone no one else bothered to call and you get the results everyone else would have expected if they had. 
    • The Saints would be 2-12 if not for us. We are 50% of their wins. A organization serious about the playoffs does not get bullied by a sh*t team like the Saints TWICE. It's over my brotha. 
×
×
  • Create New...