Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Official ARMAHGEDDON thread !


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just now, csx said:

I'm not arguing it would be immediate. I'm suggesting it's being practiced based on what Olsen said.

Again....that seems like it's more about keeping formations secret. I just can't understand any logic around keeping Armah as a blocker a secret. Why would they do that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

Again....that seems like it's more about keeping formations secret. I just can't understand any logic around keeping Armah as a blocker a secret. Why would they do that? 

I'm not thinking they have a big secret. I'm thinking wishfully that they have some new wrinkles with these new weapons that they are practicing. There is no reason to show any of it whether it's CMC, Samuel, or possibly Armah. If it's 2 they aren't showing fully it's not crazy it's 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, csx said:

I'm not thinking they have a big secret. I'm thinking wishfully that they have some new wrinkles with these new weapons that they are practicing. There is no reason to show any of it whether it's CMC, Samuel, or possibly Armah. If it's 2 they aren't showing fully it's not crazy it's 3

But they did show a bunch of stuff for CMC in camp and he and Samuel have both played with the starters (Samuel more with the 2s because Cam hasn't played much). My point is Armah has done zero of that. But....we will see next Sunday. But I'm willing to bet my car that Armah has minimal FB snaps against the 9ers. I would set 3 as the O/U

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RoaringRiot said:

But they did show a bunch of stuff for CMC in camp and he and Samuel have both played with the starters (Samuel more with the 2s because Cam hasn't played much). My point is Armah has done zero of that. But....we will see next Sunday. But I'm willing to bet my car that Armah has minimal FB snaps against the 9ers. I would set 3 as the O/U

They showed basic stuff of mcaffery before basically pulling the plug. Nothing much fancy at all from limited Samuel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

Not at camp bro. They did all kinds of new stuff <sigh>

Camp is irrelevant  They aren't showing new stuff in camp.  

Olsen just said this. I'm done arguing in circles. We kept a FB...it happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, csx said:

Camp is irrelevant  They aren't showing new stuff in camp.  

Olsen just said this. I'm done arguing in circles. We kept a FB...it happened.

I never said they weren't keeping a FB. I'm just telling you the way they were (or weren't) used because I was there. BV has Tweeted multiple times today that the worry of losing Armah played a lot in their decision. Like I said, we'll see next weekend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RoaringRiot said:

Lol....K

Either you aren't understanding what I'm saying or you have not been following camps very long.

The teams don't give away strategic hints. This is something that was common knowledge when I started following these things in 1995. I'm not saying this to sound smart....Im not....its just incredibly obvious and needs to be stated again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
    • Kinda depends how you look at it both were 3rd round draft pics.  Nico was nothing before stroud and tank came in with stroud.  If both were on the panthers would young have them doing well and starting or would their stats be low.  I really dont know the answer to that.  None of the panthers wrs have left and did well either but personally i feel neither of nico or tank would do much on the panthers.  
×
×
  • Create New...