Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seattle | Luke Wilson trade?


Ace_Aladdin

Trade  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Trade Seattle for Luke Wilson

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      17


Recommended Posts

When Panthers where in a pinch in 2015 season after KB's injury, they looked to the hawks to acquire depth at the receiver position ala Kevin Norwood. The 2017 season has eerie familiarity to SB appearance season where depth is needed after key player is lost to a non contact injury. The defense is looking like its former self and can hold the fort down, but if want to make deep post-season run we must shore up the TE dept especially being a run first team.

Luke Wilson should be familiar name to the Panthers fan who has ruined couple of season with his game winning TD in close heated defensive battles. Hawks have excellent depth with Graham & last year rookie Vannett and would be willing to move him for the right scenario. He is only 27 years old and you can never have enough Luke on this team.

 

TE: Luke Wilson 6'-5" 255 lbs

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or we could just give Dickson a chance instead of throwing it 10 feet over his head every time he's wide open. We could also use our big WR's better and more often. KB and Funchess both proved they can make big catches yesterday. I would also like to point out that Funchess has caught every catchable pass that has come his way, so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Olsens health was that important to our season than we were doomed from the start. If the coaches and FO think Funchess, Dickson, CMC, and Samuel are good as they think they are then we should be okay. Would love for us to sign Barnidge but that's not happening. Besides we'll get Olsen back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

Or we could just give Dickson a chance instead of throwing it 10 feet over his head every time he's wide open. We could also use our big WR's better and more often. KB and Funchess both proved they can make big catches yesterday. I would also like to point out that Funchess has caught every catchable pass that has come his way, so far.

We still need depth behind Dickson, our Big WR's are not TEs who can come in as FB and block for power/zone runs.

We don't need anymore oversized WRs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

Or we could just give Dickson a chance instead of throwing it 10 feet over his head every time he's wide open. We could also use our big WR's better and more often. KB and Funchess both proved they can make big catches yesterday. I would also like to point out that Funchess has caught every catchable pass that has come his way, so far.

This.  Unless Luke Wilson is 9 feet tall and has a 40 foot catch radius then I think "the answer is already on the roster"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love reading these trade for TE scenarios and all.  And how nice it would be have a good TE.  But how about we just get our OC to evolve/adjust.  He begged for more weapons and blamed the offensive failures on lack of weapons vs his lack of playcalling.

 

We just drafted 2 of them.  We have used 1 in CMC.

 

Now it's time to put up or shut up (Or pack your bags if it were up to me)  we don't have a stud TE anymore but we have this shiny jack of all trades slot WR in Samuel.  Just go to more 3 WR sets with KB, Funch, and Shepard in the slot.  You have seen more teams go to this around the league adjusting to this when needed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, this year we should've easily been a playoff team in my opinion. We should have easily had two or three more wins--at least one--had not Bryce crapped the bed. But let's be serious about human nature and what we know about our FO. I wouldn't bet the farm that Bryce will be anything but the defacto starter in 2026, because (inconsistent though it was) we have exceeded expectations this year, and some in the FO probably believe, rightly or wrongly, that Bryce is at the center of that. You know, piece of bread seems like a meal if all you've had is a cracker. That being said, Bryce has shown plenty of inconsistency if not a downright pattern of flaws. He's a third year QB, and some, if not most, of his metrics aren't pretty. It could be argued that he should be further along (for me it's not really arguable). So, hopefully the decision makers will acquire a couple of plan Bs. I would hate it and love it if we identified "our guy" in the draft, and that it was somehow achievable to acquire him with a couple of high draft picks or even less. But we already pulled the trigger on Bryce with arguably awful results, so that's got to make the decision makers a little skittish to repeat a mistake that should be still fresh on everyone's mind. That being said, I think that it's more likely that we acquire a player like Mac Jones, Malik Willis or Trey Lance in free agency, and also target a day two or day three developmental pick in the draft with some real upside. That pick for would be Drew Allar who should slide to day three (I'm thinking). I think that this is more realistic than them releasing Bryce from his starter's role from the get-go, or someone just flat out playing themselves definitely into the starter's role by the time the season begins.  Now, again, if we can find "our guy" that changes the narrative and is expected to be the starter from day one, I'd be excited, if not downright ecstatic, but I don't think that's a realistic expectation.  Getting back to the team in general, If we don't make some improvements, including QB, I wouldn't bet that we'd necessarily be a playoff team next year, because, the rest of the NFCS is likely to improve next year. I don't expect that teams in our division will be necessarily able to "backdoor" themselves into the playoffs next season. So we're going to have to hit on at least a couple of picks, get healthy along the line, and fundamentally change the way we're calling plays because lightning probably isn't striking twice. I'm hoping that we'll have a real breakthrough season by 2028, because this season and next season aren't likely to be it because removing ball-and-chains ain't easy unless you got the key, and It's still gonna take some time to find it.
    • Necas is not the missing piece here.
×
×
  • Create New...