Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seattle | Luke Wilson trade?


Ace_Aladdin

Trade  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Trade Seattle for Luke Wilson

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      17


Recommended Posts

When Panthers where in a pinch in 2015 season after KB's injury, they looked to the hawks to acquire depth at the receiver position ala Kevin Norwood. The 2017 season has eerie familiarity to SB appearance season where depth is needed after key player is lost to a non contact injury. The defense is looking like its former self and can hold the fort down, but if want to make deep post-season run we must shore up the TE dept especially being a run first team.

Luke Wilson should be familiar name to the Panthers fan who has ruined couple of season with his game winning TD in close heated defensive battles. Hawks have excellent depth with Graham & last year rookie Vannett and would be willing to move him for the right scenario. He is only 27 years old and you can never have enough Luke on this team.

 

TE: Luke Wilson 6'-5" 255 lbs

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or we could just give Dickson a chance instead of throwing it 10 feet over his head every time he's wide open. We could also use our big WR's better and more often. KB and Funchess both proved they can make big catches yesterday. I would also like to point out that Funchess has caught every catchable pass that has come his way, so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Olsens health was that important to our season than we were doomed from the start. If the coaches and FO think Funchess, Dickson, CMC, and Samuel are good as they think they are then we should be okay. Would love for us to sign Barnidge but that's not happening. Besides we'll get Olsen back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

Or we could just give Dickson a chance instead of throwing it 10 feet over his head every time he's wide open. We could also use our big WR's better and more often. KB and Funchess both proved they can make big catches yesterday. I would also like to point out that Funchess has caught every catchable pass that has come his way, so far.

We still need depth behind Dickson, our Big WR's are not TEs who can come in as FB and block for power/zone runs.

We don't need anymore oversized WRs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

Or we could just give Dickson a chance instead of throwing it 10 feet over his head every time he's wide open. We could also use our big WR's better and more often. KB and Funchess both proved they can make big catches yesterday. I would also like to point out that Funchess has caught every catchable pass that has come his way, so far.

This.  Unless Luke Wilson is 9 feet tall and has a 40 foot catch radius then I think "the answer is already on the roster"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love reading these trade for TE scenarios and all.  And how nice it would be have a good TE.  But how about we just get our OC to evolve/adjust.  He begged for more weapons and blamed the offensive failures on lack of weapons vs his lack of playcalling.

 

We just drafted 2 of them.  We have used 1 in CMC.

 

Now it's time to put up or shut up (Or pack your bags if it were up to me)  we don't have a stud TE anymore but we have this shiny jack of all trades slot WR in Samuel.  Just go to more 3 WR sets with KB, Funch, and Shepard in the slot.  You have seen more teams go to this around the league adjusting to this when needed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Poster board? Were you trying to use the term poster child?
    • I mean, you're acting like we don't see the tippy-toe bunny hops, jump throws more than normal (with both feet dangling in the air every which a way), and off-platform but off-balance throws that arrive short or sail high. Could that be bad mechanics due to being short? Could a seeming propensity to bail the pocket towards the sidelines early as opposed to sitting in the pocket tall and strong, surveying his reads, be an attempt at trying to see an open throwing lane? I'm not saying that what you're saying isn't a contributing factor to what has been an underwhelming display of executing the QB position, but this is year three, and if the lightbulb hasn't switched on by now---if you haven't figured out that guys are faster, stronger and generally more athletic, then what's it going to take? It's hard to forget that "mental processing" was supposed to be Bryce Young's superpower. Are you telling me that he can't nail down such an easy concept as, "I can't get away with the things I did in college at the pro level," is that right? If he can't get past that, then that surely limits his ability to successfully execute all the other stuff.  Look, I'm not trying to be flippant. I acknowledge that playing pro football is more complex than a lot of fans realize, but all we can do, as fans, is observe. One of my favorite things to do is just look at the greater picture and think what part human nature is playing in the many decisions that are being made or have to be made. You're absolutely correct that fans don't know exactly what's going on, but that is by design, and in many ways it's just the nature of the beast. Some things we can't know. That being said, the professionals screw the hell up all the time. The professionals disagree all the time. These disagreements can be within the same franchise or from franchise to franchise. And sometimes these decisions are all over the place, so excuse me if I ain't exactly buying the I-know-more-than-thee sentiment and that that means that professionals always make better decisions than fans would about certain players. Some of this stuff is simply luck or a crapshoot.
×
×
  • Create New...