Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robert Kraft Speaks Out On Trump Comments, JR declines to make a statement


beastson

Recommended Posts

Just now, Cookie Lyon said:

Even if Jerry Richardson did release a statement, it would just be like all of the other weak statements from NFL owners.

Something is better than nothing. Its like ignoring an obvious problem. Thats been a problem. White people need to stop ignoring racism and prejudice as if it doesn't exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cookie Lyon said:

I agree that he should say something, but he won't. 

Who are we to say what he should or shouldn't do? If the man felt like he needed to respond, he would. It's all reactionary BS. 

His statements are not the worst thing government has done in the sports world. It's not like there's Congressional hearings going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Bunch of old white men reacting to Trump, trying not to look racist. poo is hilarious.

EXACTLY! Kraft told his players (last year) he would match dollar for dollar donations to the community. Now, he wants to pull this crap..

Yet, with no evidence...they susupend players on a he said,she said situation and fight all the way to the Surpreme Court...over it.

 

NFL owners...GROW SOME BALLS and remind the employees  they are ON THE JOB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PlantBasedPoster said:

He was stating this at a press conference and speaking as the President, not as a citizen. He doesn't get to say his opinion when he is acting and speaking as the president, sorry, doesn't work that way. 

Obama's spoken out over the Redskin's name and countless other issues in his speeches. Perfectly legal as long as government doesn't infringe upon anyone's rights. Saying words doesn't force anyone to do anything.

Whether you agree with the opinion or not, the President can legally say whatever's on his mind on matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

Obama's spoken out over the Redskin's name and countless other issues in his speeches. Perfectly legal as long as government doesn't infringe upon anyone's rights. Saying words doesn't force anyone to do anything.

Whether you agree with the opinion or not, the President can legally say whatever's on his mind on matters.

You forget, the left gets the double standard pass on EVERYTHING...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
    • I saw Brooks maybe a few weeks ago, he was walking pretty normally. of course he wasnt running, jumping and cutting.
×
×
  • Create New...