Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Shula's Words About "Encouragement From Film" In Context.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Looks like Rivera's not the only one who's quote got taken out of context.

Here's what Shula has to say:

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Grill-Bill-Justified-concerns-/0e52fd28-305f-46c0-bab2-edd5dc7c04a6

Quote

I get why tweets about this made many aghast. So, for what it’s worth, here's the full exchange:

“If you can believe this or not, I'm more encouraged, because I was like everybody else – down. And we're still down. But after watching the tape, I'm more encouraged than I was at this time last week.”

Why is that?

“I think there's guys that are getting a better feel for us doing things. Christian (McCaffrey) continues to get better. Curtis (Samuel) is becoming more involved. Ed (Dickson) played well with a lot more snaps, although he's been very consistent throughout. Chris Manhertz had a few more snaps and he did a nice job. And there were guys that were filling in that played a position or ran a route that they never even practice. (Devin) Funchess going from one side to the other, taking a lot of snaps for (Kelvin Benjamin). And Cam, fundamentally, that was probably as good as he's been consistently. Unfortunately, our mistakes were bad. You're going to make mistakes; you just hate for them to end up in turnovers against a good offense.”

I completely agree. Cam's fundamentals in the pocket were really good. Curtis Samuel being more involved is encouraging, and hopefully that translates to more targets. Funchess has been real nice and just needs Cam to throw an accurate deep ball again.

Mistakes were costly. On that first drive, everything was spotless until Matt Kalil messed up on his assignment. Cam's reads were not the best and led to costly decisions. Some of the playcalls need work. 

But honestly, this isn't that far-fetched of an assessment from Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Saca312 said:
Quote

“I think there's guys that are getting a better feel for us doing things. Christian (McCaffrey) continues to get better. Curtis (Samuel) is becoming more involved. Ed (Dickson) played well with a lot more snaps, although he's been very consistent throughout. Chris Manhertz had a few more snaps and he did a nice job. And there were guys that were filling in that played a position or ran a route that they never even practice. (Devin) Funchess going from one side to the other, taking a lot of snaps for (Kelvin Benjamin). And Cam, fundamentally, that was probably as good as he's been consistently. Unfortunately, our mistakes were bad. You're going to make mistakes; you just hate for them to end up in turnovers against a good offense.”

I completely agree. Cam's fundamentals in the pocket were really good. Curtis Samuel being more involved is encouraging, and hopefully that translates to more targets. Funchess has been real nice and just needs Cam to throw an accurate deep ball again.

Mistakes were costly. On that first drive, everything was spotless until Matt Kalil messed up on his assignment. Cam's reads were not the best and led to costly decisions. Some of the playcalls need work. 

But honestly, this isn't that far-fetched of an assessment from Shula.

Unleash  the  2 TE/RB set which puts our best players on the field.

 

59c822f7c8779_ScreenShot2017-04-16at11_21_48PM.png.ade43d564fd49865105b9d3c22e02564.png59c852e54d1a4_HeavyOffense1.thumb.png.aea58316bde0142144891a861ff371a1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Trying to make sense out of Mike Shula

bcf.png

 

 

Quote

“I think there's guys that are getting a better feel for us doing things. Christian (McCaffrey) continues to get better. Curtis (Samuel) is becoming more involved. Ed (Dickson) played well with a lot more snaps, although he's been very consistent throughout. Chris Manhertz had a few more

 

The sooner we use both of these guys not only for blocking but in the receiving game the better this offense becomes and actually puts up points on a consistent basis.

 

59c822f7c8779_ScreenShot2017-04-16at11_21_48PM.png.ade43d564fd49865105b9d3c22e02564.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

"You're going to make mistakes"

 

I wonder how often Belichick tells his team this.

Yea but he gets free  6 wins for being in a shitty divison, oh yeah and gets to pick his own players that fits his scheme.

Great thing we drafted Butler instead of Hunter Henry or OT instead of busted DE & WR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I listened to the full Shula presser (so appreciate Roaring Riot Report posting that and the Wilks audio too... I think both are taken down now, they're generally only up for 24 hours), and I understood the context of his remarks, but I still was bothered by it.

1) If THAT was Cam looking "sound on his fundamentals," we're in BIG TROUBLE.  Lots of misreads, it seemed.... 3 INTs.  No thanks.

2) At least 3 or 4 times in the full Shula presser, he commented something like "you're not going to believe this" and "it may seem like I'm making excuses, but...."

It just wasn't believable.  Shula is a glass half-full kind of guy.  He was unable to stand up there and point a finger at what's wrong, take responsibility and commit to fixing it as best he can given the limitations of our personnel and injuries.  He's looking at things through rose colored glasses.

I was pretty bothered by it.

Basically as so many have said over and over, Shula is quite good on his scripted drives at the beginning of the game.  And regarding those drives, there were some nice things to look at, 1st drive especially, in terms of how we moved the ball.

But 7 or 8 of the remaining drives were pretty awful...  Shula has shown he doesn't know how to adjust. 

So Shula may be optimistic about how his 1 or 2 scripted drives looked.  Some things worked.  But the rest of the game???  I'm not sure he watched it all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Yeah, I listened to the full Shula presser (so appreciate Roaring Riot Report posting that and the Wilks audio too... I think both are taken down now, they're generally only up for 24 hours), and I understood the context of his remarks, but I still was bothered by it.

1) If THAT was Cam looking "sound on his fundamentals," we're in BIG TROUBLE.  Lots of misreads, it seemed.... 3 INTs.  No thanks.

2) At least 3 or 4 times in the full Shula presser, he commented something like "you're not going to believe this" and "it may seem like I'm making excuses, but...."

It just wasn't believable.  Shula is a glass half-full kind of guy.  He was unable to stand up there and point a finger at what's wrong, take responsibility and commit to fixing it as best he can given the limitations of our personnel and injuries.  He's looking at things through rose colored glasses.

I was pretty bothered by it.

Basically as so many have said over and over, Shula is quite good on his scripted drives at the beginning of the game.  And regarding those drives, there were some nice things to look at, 1st drive especially, in terms of how we moved the ball.

But 7 or 8 of the remaining drives were pretty awful...  Shula has shown he doesn't know how to adjust. 

So Shula may be optimistic about how his 1 or 2 scripted drives looked.  Some things worked.  But the rest of the game???  I'm not sure he watched it all!

Cam can audible out of plays or use  motions to recognize the coverage defense is in. He needs to improve his pre-snap game first if this offense is going to truly evolve.

One example is the 3rd down screen to Samuel, he should have motioned CMC out to right and see what kind of defense Saints where playing , now he has 2 options to go and MLB would have to hesitate were the ball is going. The blitz was coming from right so if he detects that CMC would have been wide open for a big gain. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...