Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayo


52Beast

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

david mayo has definitely made strides. if luke is out for an extended period of time, i feel confident with Mayo in center field. 

almost as confident as I felt about AJ Klein last year

Truth be told, I like Mayo more than Klein.  IMO, his coverage skills are better and he seems to have a nose for the ball, and play call for that matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What am I missing here?  Yes, Mayo is decent against the run.  However in coverage, he has looked HORRENDOUS.  Not to mention, that two point conversion.  Firstly, they wouldn't have gone for it if Luke were in the game, but secondly, and more importantly, Mayo looked worthless on that play.  Not sure how you can be that confident in him moving forward

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PantherNation123 said:

What am I missing here?  Yes, Mayo is decent against the run.  However in coverage, he has looked HORRENDOUS.  Not to mention, that two point conversion.  Firstly, they wouldn't have gone for it if Luke were in the game, but secondly, and more importantly, Mayo looked worthless on that play.  Not sure how you can be that confident in him moving forward

Mayo looked a bit lost at first but as the game progressed he looked better. That two point conversion was more on KK and TD. But really it was good blocking by the Eagles and a small cutback by Blount that made that conversion successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...