Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here's a few questions our weak reporters should ask Ron and Cam


beastson

Recommended Posts

Cam talking about 2 turnovers. Ron talk about 2 turnovers and the deep ball that lead to 3 for Chicago. He said the game came down to those 3 plays, no it didn't

2 turnovers is not the end of the world

The questions are simple, why does this team struggle overcoming losing the turnover battle? Why when this team gets down big, they rarely win? Why was this team lifeless only being down 2 scores? Off-topic question, but related to this team problem. If this team was down 28-9 entering the 4th quarter in the SB, do you honestly think you can win? Is this a Superbowl caliber team right now? Why isn't your defense forcing turnovers? 1 interception all year, is that acceptable? What needs to change to make sure our players are in position to get interceptions like other defenses are against us? Why this team had more time to prepare for Chicago and looked worse than when they had less time to prepare for Philly? Please give us an idea of how this team prepare, do you look at weak spots on opposing teams? Do you look for mismatches and how to exploit them? Do you believe what happens on the field comes to down to execution only?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You won’t hear any worthwhile questions bc the reporters don’t really care about this team. They’re probably all just a bunch of Saints and cowboy fans trying to earn a pay check. No one wants to be that one reporter who stirs the pot and points the finger at coaches. Ask the generics, keep coaches happy with you, earn your pay, and go home. 

 

If fans or anyone who gave a rats ass about this team asked the questions, you best believe Ron would have some major questions to answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, beastson said:

Cam talking about 2 turnovers. Ron talk about 2 turnovers and the deep ball that lead to 3 for Chicago. He said the game came down to those 3 plays, no it didn't

2 turnovers is not the end of the world

The questions are simple, why does this team struggle overcoming losing the turnover battle? Why when this team gets down big, they rarely win? Why was this team lifeless only being down 2 scores? Off-topic question, but related to this team problem. If this team was down 28-9 entering the 4th quarter in the SB, do you honestly think you can win? Is this a Superbowl caliber team right now? Why isn't your defense forcing turnovers? 1 interception all year, is that acceptable? What needs to change to make sure our players are in position to get interceptions like other defenses are against us? Why this team had more time to prepare for Chicago and looked worse than when they had less time to prepare for Philly? Please give us an idea of how this team prepare, do you look at weak spots on opposing teams? Do you look for mismatches and how to exploit them? Do you believe what happens on the field comes to down to execution only?

It is really so much simpler than that

why has this team never learned how to handle a blitz..doesn't matter if it's a corner blitz or up the middle they simply can't do it

of course asking hard questions gets reporters fired 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...