Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles vs Seahawks


Panther49er

Recommended Posts

Really should be Rooting for the Seahawks. In a Scenario where we tie with the Seahawks And lions we will be the odd man out. And looking at the lions remaining schedule I find it hard to look for another lost. While I see 2 potential lost for us in the vike n falcons maybe green bay 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CatZilla said:

Really should be Rooting for the Seahawks. In a Scenario where we tie with the Seahawks And lions we will be the odd man out. And looking at the lions remaining schedule I find it hard to look for another lost. While I see 2 potential lost for us in the vike n falcons maybe green bay 

The fug? We need Seattle to lose as much as possible, simple as that. Obviously not happening tonight, but you’re crazy to say we should be rooting for them to win. The 2 WC spots are going to come down to us, them, and the Falcons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CatZilla said:

Really should be Rooting for the Seahawks. In a Scenario where we tie with the Seahawks And lions we will be the odd man out. And looking at the lions remaining schedule I find it hard to look for another lost. While I see 2 potential lost for us in the vike n falcons maybe green bay 

If we tie with the Lions how would they be ahead of us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...