Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post Week 13 , Power Rankings


Pantha-kun

Recommended Posts

NFL : #9

ESPN : #9

BleedingGreenNation : #10

Bleacher Report : #7

Sporting News : #8

You think around #9 is the right spot for this team? I'm surprised tbh, I think its more to do with our current record than anything else. Defense has been exposed 2 weeks strait and we clearly lack WR talent and a consistent run game. This team feel like it should be somewhere right in the middle 16 or 17. And it will be if we get spanked by the Vikings .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we beat MN they're going to drop the Vikings a fair amount but keep us hovering around 10 still for some reason. Really sucks that we essentially blew the division Sunday. That was as must win a game as there can be. However I do think our recent playoff experience can help boost us over teams in the playoffs even on the road. Eagles, Rams, Vikings, Aints all have essentially no recent playoff experience. We have a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pantha-kun said:

NFL : #9

ESPN : #9

BleedingGreenNation : #10

Bleacher Report : #7

Sporting News : #8

You think around #9 is the right spot for this team? I'm surprised tbh, I think its more to do with our current record than anything else. Defense has been exposed 2 weeks strait and we clearly lack WR talent and a consistent run game. This team feel like it should be somewhere right in the middle 16 or 17. And it will be if we get spanked by the Vikings .

We're a playoff team. Stop being a debbie downer. Last I checked, 8-4, and we've beaten the Super Bowl teams from last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RumHam said:

We're a playoff team. Stop being a debbie downer. Last I checked, 8-4, and we've beaten the Super Bowl teams from last year. 

I'll stop being negative when we beat a real football team like the Vikings. If not, then getting swept by the Saints and losing to the Vikes just show they're just marginal pretenders who shouldnt be respected. Patriots were still trying to get their defense to gell in the early season and ATL was a Julio drop away from that being a very different game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...