Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Attacking D to end the game!!!


Ra's Al Ghul

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Ra's Al Ghul said:

That is how we should play defense. We harassed all game, get good lead. Then go soft, nearly lose. Cam saves us and we play aggressive D to finish out. 

 

Hopefully they learned something today.

Agree. I know he gets hate on here, but Shaq is really solid off the blitz. We could have used that today. In the end, they got the job done and got the W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ra's Al Ghul said:

That is how we should play defense. We harassed all game, get good lead. Then go soft, nearly lose. Cam saves us and we play aggressive D to finish out. 

 

Hopefully they learned something today.

Exactly the soft coverage before is the reason they came back in the game.

Love the off coverage but still send LBs and to blitz. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

Agree. I know he gets hate on here, but Shaq is really solid off the blitz. We could have used that today. In the end, they got the job done and got the W

I think the most important thing a D can do is make a QB uncomfortable. Even poo Web's can sit back and find yards without pressure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, teeray said:

Playing soft was not the issue.  Allowing 8-10 yard passes go for 40 yards after the catch is.

I can understand that. Though if you give 8-10 every play, not long until they are in FG range or scoring on us. We are not bringing the fight, we are being reactive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ra's Al Ghul said:

I can understand that. Though if you give 8-10 every play, not long until they are in FG range or scoring on us. We are not bringing the fight, we are being reactive.

True.  If we we're up 7or8 then I agree wholeheartedly.

But we wanted then to take time and get clock to under 3 min.  Instead of letting them get anscore with 5 min lwft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sanjay_rajput said:

Exactly the soft coverage before is the reason they came back in the game.

Love the off coverage but still send LBs and to blitz. 

Agreed, that is exactly how we ended the game. With our DB's off but sending pressure. It works, get QB out of rhythm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...