Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What the team looks like in the future??


NeedSumD

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Tomás The Boss said:

Hope he does but I think the writing's on the wall. For all we know his shenanigans got limited to the press by league insiders trying to get rid of him so they can move the team. My dad knows Hurney and from what he says, wouldn't surprise me if Hurney was in on it.

Sure he does.. Idiot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tomás The Boss said:

Hope he does but I think the writing's on the wall. For all we know his shenanigans got limited to the press by league insiders trying to get rid of him so they can move the team. My dad knows Hurney and from what he says, wouldn't surprise me if Hurney was in on it.

My dad knows JR...check that, JR is my "pappy".  lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shonuff said:

My dad knows JR...check that, JR is my "pappy".  lol.

This guy hates cam and talks so much poo about him until he's banned. Then makes an alt and disappears cuz we're doing well.  Then he comes back the day after we clinch a playoff berth to talk more poo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

This guy hates cam and talks so much poo about him until he's banned. Then makes an alt and disappears cuz we're doing well.  Then he comes back the day after we clinch a playoff berth to talk more poo. 

Replacing Cam is going to determine the future of the team.  It's difficult to find QB like Cam.  There are more accurate QBs but finding a QB as durable that can will a team to victory is tough to find.  For instance, remember when all the talk was about getting Andrew Luck and he dissed Carolina by staying in college and the Panthers were kind of "forced" to pick Cam.  Luck is a good QB, and still could be great but he's been injured a lot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tomás The Boss said:

I actually have met JR but I was 12 and it was for a ceremony - he didn't tell me anything about the team moving, lol

Nobody cares...it's the internet, we all know celebrities, rich people and are really really smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, NeedSumD said:

So we all know JR loves his vets even fired a GM to keep a few of them.   The new owner is going to be a different mind set, And probably more cap conscious.  So is a youth movement in our new future and if so where does the cuts start and stop??

I wouldn't be so sure the owner will be much different than JR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...