Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thought this would be entertaining


NeedSumD

Recommended Posts

Actually you did nothing but reinforce the fact that stats arent everything. Look whoelse is on that list, Marino,  mcnabb, warren moon. HOF Qbs with the same completion percentage as Cam. Somebody must of missed the memo on those guys huh? Good job buddy, you gave us some facts alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Dan Marino isn't even 1% higher than Cam and literally every 30 for 30 you see where they interview a QB that QB says Dan is the best pure passer ever.

Facts indeed.

Yeah 62,000 yards and 25,000 yards yeah You got me there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Actually you did nothing but reinforce the fact that stats arent everything. Look whoelse is on that list, Marino,  mcnabb, warren moon. HOF Qbs with the same completion percentage as Cam. Somebody must of missed the memo on those guys huh? Good job buddy, you gave us some facts alright.

I wonder what all the guys you just mentioned have in common :thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam plays in a system where he'll never be a high percentage passer, and no QB in this system would. Tons of modern QBs now are throwing 65% plus easily in these WC style systems. Completion percentage is a really stupid stat to look at when judging QB play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NeedSumD said:

Yeah 62,000 yards and 25,000 yards yeah You got me there.   

LOL...percentage isnt the same as accumulated yards. You only rack up yards with more time in the league. Cam is just 28 in 7 seasons not a retired 15 plus year vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Cam plays in a system where he'll never be a high percentage passer, and no QB in this system would. Tons of modern QBs now are throwing 65% plus easily in these WC style systems. Completion percentage is a really stupid stat to look at when judging QB play.

His completion percentage could easily be 5 points higher if he would just simply hit the wide open check down like the one he repeatedly ignores every game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NeedSumD said:

Yeah 62,000 yards and 25,000 yards yeah You got me there.   

Look at this retarded piece of poo compare 17 years of yards to 7 and not even total yards(missing TDs for a reason too) after derping the first comparison. You're a Paramecium brained Neanderthal with a fat tub of lard for a mom.

PAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read that Pittsburgh is a possibility.  I think of college QB studs who had some form of mental quirk yet tons of talent--but their issue made being a team leader difficult and it led to their demise--going back:  Jamarcus Russell, Art Schlichter, Jeff George, etc. I think people forget that the QB must not only have talent, but they must lead.  
    • I wish I knew more details, but the NIL money to 20-year olds combined with easy access to gambling sites is a side effect that these kids may not have considered.  To your point,A famous 2009 Sports Illustrated article titled “How (and Why) Athletes Go Broke” estimated that 78% of retired NFL players go bankrupt or face significant financial stress within two years of leaving the league.  I am guessing that ego and $$$ and the thrill of competition (most pro athletes love competition because they are the winners) makes it a powerful temptation.  Throw in the ease of gambling on your phone which is always in your hand, and I see your point x 10.
    • Freeling got some reps at RT when they gave Moton a rest day--I sorta hope Freeling gets brought along slowly as you describe.  It would be better for him for reasons you provide.  We have a really good problem. 
×
×
  • Create New...