Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sunday Divisional Round Games


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

I always felt the Vikings were the best team in the NFC because of the stronger level of competition they faced this year a lot of people forget the Eagles, Patriots, and Steelers had some of the easiest schedules in the league this year yet the Vikings still finished with the exact same record as those 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Borat said:

I don't think he's quite an MVP caliber QB, but he's definitely a big upgrade on Foles and I believe they'd be clearly the class of the NFC (rather than the coinflip I think it is now). 

Wentz is definitely overrated. i have been saying him having the 15th ranked passing attack, vs a top 5 rushing defense and rushing offense contributed to his success. Usually, the MVP has a top 5 passing attack, because he is dealing, or in Cam's case, the top offense a few years ago for the panthers when he was dealing with his arms and legs.

Eagles were a top offense, but it was due to their rushing, not Wentz. How are you the MVP when your arm nor legs have your team in top five offensive Territory? He was the leader in TDs because the rushing and defense got him there. If his arm was getting them in the endzone, no way would they be ranked 15th in passing when he was under center.

 

We seen what happens when him or Dak are asked to win it with their arms. In KC and SEA, Wentz was asked to come from behind...couldn't do it. He is definitely the MVP when things are going great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chris1 said:

I always felt the Vikings were the best team in the NFC because of the stronger level of competition they faced this year a lot of people forget the Eagles, Patriots, and Steelers had some of the easiest schedules in the league this year yet the Vikings still finished with the exact same record as those 3.

Their schedule is a bit skewed. They got the Packers twice, but didn't face Rodgers in 1 of them and hurt Rodgers early in the other one.

I agree though, their schedule was much harder than the Eagles and Steelers. Pats had to play our division, so they at least had to play several playoff teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Their schedule is a bit skewed. They got the Packers twice, but didn't face Rodgers in 1 of them and hurt Rodgers early in the other one.

I agree though, their schedule was much harder than the Eagles and Steelers. Pats had to play our division, so they at least had to play several playoff teams.

The Packers weren't that bad without Rodgers this yet tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...