Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

we can fix our wr core in freeagency without spending big $$


juliosantos

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Trill OG said:

There is no elite WR in FA. We will go after the burners Wallace/Brown/Pryor to give Norv a deepthreat in his offense.

All three of those guys will fit our price range.

I'll bang the drum again--Terrelle Pryor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the All around good WR's who could be number 1 WR are off the market.. Go with a Burner like (Wallace, John or Jaron Brown) or one of the young guys like Moncerif, Richardson, or Lee.. Moncerif and Richardson can also burn as well..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when was the last time a slot WR took over a game? Jarvis is a good wr that will be hilariously overpaid by someone and i really hope its not us. 

 

We don't need a slot guy. CS played fairly well there when healthy. CMC can also play that role very well when he isn't in the backfield. We need outside Wrs

 

Also everyones been preaching speed but Jarvis isn't even that fast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

when was the last time a slot WR took over a game? Jarvis is a good wr that will be hilariously overpaid by someone and i really hope its not us. 

 

We don't need a slot guy. CS played fairly well there when healthy. CMC can also play that role very well when he isn't in the backfield. We need outside Wrs

 

Also everyones been preaching speed but Jarvis isn't even that fast

Jarvis Landry is overrated. Just look at the Dolphins message boards, their fans even know he is not worth 14mil a yr. I don't know why people even considered him as a target for us. He doesn't fit our offense at all. We already have a Landry with CMC and Samuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

dude will be dirt cheap after his bust year too. Im fine with throwing a couple mill his way.

Waste of a couple Mil... You ppl always fall in love with somebody else failed projects while claiming another with a history of actual production is overrated..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, davos said:

Honestly, we should make a trade.  The FA market is mostly trash and the top WRs in the draft are somewhat thin pickins'.

Trade we are limited as well, not many legit WR's on the trade block. Only realistic options available imo are Gordon/Dez/Martavis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Terrell Pryor has David Gettis, Dominick Hickson, and Rod Gardner written all over him.. 

Cheap price no rewards and another wasted year for Cam..

Didn't know those players had a 1000 yards receiving in their entire career. At least try to be realistic when comparing players.SMH

Realistically we can afford to gamble on Pryor because he will be cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ras977 said:

Absolutely agree.

I think some people are down on Pryor because they don't think he can be a #1 WR. I agree he is not a #1. My thing with Pryor is he can play the Ginn role, but with a lot more upside because he is younger. I think he could be a consistent deep threat for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...