Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Monster Hunter world

carpanfan96

By carpanfan96,
in Nerdvana

Recommended Posts

Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

My mind wants me to buy this game and play it.    I've never played these games though and I feel I may not want to grind as much as that's needed, but then again, I feel like grinding half the time haha.    I may end up getting it if some friends do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted

I'm thinking about it.  It looks pretty cool.  The system seem really deep though.  I just don't think I'd have the time to really dig into until the summer.  The graphics are pretty intense, and the AI looks to make an interesting game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
  • Author
Posted
39 minutes ago, RealBitsOfPanther said:

I'm really enjoying it. It's my first MH game so it's a little overwhelming at first, but once you play a couple of hours, you start figuring things out pretty quick. 

It definitely is but less so then previous games, if your on PS4 my ID is Ch40t1cd3lusi0ns

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, d-dave said:

I'm thinking about it.  It looks pretty cool.  The system seem really deep though.  I just don't think I'd have the time to really dig into until the summer.  The graphics are pretty intense, and the AI looks to make an interesting game.

It's pretty time consuming, especially if your hunting achievements. Most monsters or quests take between 15-45m each and there's hundreds of side quests, investigations, and other types of things to do quest wise plus over 50 monsters with more on the way plus the main story line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, Zaximus said:

My mind wants me to buy this game and play it.    I've never played these games though and I feel I may not want to grind as much as that's needed, but then again, I feel like grinding half the time haha.    I may end up getting it if some friends do.

 

It's definitely worth getting, it's less grindy then the previous entry's in the series but there's still a bit of grinding involved for armour and weapon building. I've got it on ps4, had to sell my gaming pc sadly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
  • Author
Posted
38 minutes ago, SOJA said:

hadn't seen much about this till this thread, might get into this when I have more time

question to carpanfan bc you seem to know a lot, is multiplayer required or are you able to beat most of the game solo?

You're able to beat the game solo, no problems. It's built around the online play but it isn't intrusive on the gameplay. There's nice touches like the SOS flare if you run into problems with a quest and want to ask the online players to help you. So it's really dependant on how you want to play, most of the gameplay is a loop. Go on this quest to kill this monster, use loot from monster to make better gear, a little grind since you need to kill a monster more then once to make a set of armour or such. 

 

Short and simple, you can play solo all the way through or with 3 friends. I've gone online once and I've done 17-20 missions so far. 

 

hopefully that helps some but I can't recommend this game enough. I've had the Flu the last 3-4 days and I've put about 19-20 hours in so far with it. Nothing quite like the feeling you get when your fighting a T-Rex like Monster and then a bigger Dragon like Monster drops in and starts attacking both of you with swoop attacks, charges and fire breathing attacks while you're rolling this way and that way trying not to get poisoned or burned and trying to place nicely timed attacks in between the chaos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

You're able to beat the game solo, no problems. It's built around the online play but it isn't intrusive on the gameplay. There's nice touches like the SOS flare if you run into problems with a quest and want to ask the online players to help you. So it's really dependant on how you want to play, most of the gameplay is a loop. Go on this quest to kill this monster, use loot from monster to make better gear, a little grind since you need to kill a monster more then once to make a set of armour or such. 

 

Short and simple, you can play solo all the way through or with 3 friends. I've gone online once and I've done 17-20 missions so far. 

 

hopefully that helps some but I can't recommend this game enough. I've had the Flu the last 3-4 days and I've put about 19-20 hours in so far with it. Nothing quite like the feeling you get when your fighting a T-Rex like Monster and then a bigger Dragon like Monster drops in and starts attacking both of you with swoop attacks, charges and fire breathing attacks while you're rolling this way and that way trying not to get poisoned or burned and trying to place nicely timed attacks in between the chaos. 

thanks so much for the writeup

flu is absolutely awful this year, get better soon 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted
On 1/29/2018 at 2:24 PM, carpanfan96 said:

It's pretty time consuming, especially if your hunting achievements. Most monsters or quests take between 15-45m each and there's hundreds of side quests, investigations, and other types of things to do quest wise plus over 50 monsters with more on the way plus the main story line. 

Thanks for all your input in the thread!  This does look like an amazing game.  Summer for sure =)

Good luck recovering, heard this was a pain in the tail flu season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
  • Author
Posted
24 minutes ago, d-dave said:

Thanks for all your input in the thread!  This does look like an amazing game.  Summer for sure =)

Good luck recovering, heard this was a pain in the tail flu season.

It is a very amazing game,but I've been playing MH for about 10 years so i might be a bit biased. I can say for sure this one fixes a lot of nitpicky issues ive had with previous entries. Probably my favorite game ive played over the last two or three years and isn't that close expect for maybe BOTW. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NAS
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By NAS · Posted

      He had games where he was a top 10 QB that week, vs Saints, Falcons, Eagles, Chiefs, Bucs.  Amazing performances that I think show what he can do consistently.  
    • frankw
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By frankw · Posted

      We both know there's more that goes into batted passes than just the height of the QB. Most people here have readily acknowledged this and there were numerous discussions about it before we drafted Young. But if you are presenting a POV that Bryce's height hasn't tied to issues with his footwork then there's nothing anyone is going to be able to say to sway you and you know this. Even beyond the footwork I recall a redzone play where Bryce couldn't see around his right tackle at all where a receiver was waiting practically alone in the end zone for a touchdown. There are real world circumstances that are going to show up over the course of the upcoming season and it's up to Bryce and Dave Canales to make adjustments and do anything they can to mitigate negative instances and yes that begins with Bryce's footwork again. Thanks for your time. Have a nice weekend.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
×
×
  • Create New...