Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Monster Hunter world


carpanfan96

Recommended Posts

My mind wants me to buy this game and play it.    I've never played these games though and I feel I may not want to grind as much as that's needed, but then again, I feel like grinding half the time haha.    I may end up getting it if some friends do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking about it.  It looks pretty cool.  The system seem really deep though.  I just don't think I'd have the time to really dig into until the summer.  The graphics are pretty intense, and the AI looks to make an interesting game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, RealBitsOfPanther said:

I'm really enjoying it. It's my first MH game so it's a little overwhelming at first, but once you play a couple of hours, you start figuring things out pretty quick. 

It definitely is but less so then previous games, if your on PS4 my ID is Ch40t1cd3lusi0ns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, d-dave said:

I'm thinking about it.  It looks pretty cool.  The system seem really deep though.  I just don't think I'd have the time to really dig into until the summer.  The graphics are pretty intense, and the AI looks to make an interesting game.

It's pretty time consuming, especially if your hunting achievements. Most monsters or quests take between 15-45m each and there's hundreds of side quests, investigations, and other types of things to do quest wise plus over 50 monsters with more on the way plus the main story line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Zaximus said:

My mind wants me to buy this game and play it.    I've never played these games though and I feel I may not want to grind as much as that's needed, but then again, I feel like grinding half the time haha.    I may end up getting it if some friends do.

 

It's definitely worth getting, it's less grindy then the previous entry's in the series but there's still a bit of grinding involved for armour and weapon building. I've got it on ps4, had to sell my gaming pc sadly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, SOJA said:

hadn't seen much about this till this thread, might get into this when I have more time

question to carpanfan bc you seem to know a lot, is multiplayer required or are you able to beat most of the game solo?

You're able to beat the game solo, no problems. It's built around the online play but it isn't intrusive on the gameplay. There's nice touches like the SOS flare if you run into problems with a quest and want to ask the online players to help you. So it's really dependant on how you want to play, most of the gameplay is a loop. Go on this quest to kill this monster, use loot from monster to make better gear, a little grind since you need to kill a monster more then once to make a set of armour or such. 

 

Short and simple, you can play solo all the way through or with 3 friends. I've gone online once and I've done 17-20 missions so far. 

 

hopefully that helps some but I can't recommend this game enough. I've had the Flu the last 3-4 days and I've put about 19-20 hours in so far with it. Nothing quite like the feeling you get when your fighting a T-Rex like Monster and then a bigger Dragon like Monster drops in and starts attacking both of you with swoop attacks, charges and fire breathing attacks while you're rolling this way and that way trying not to get poisoned or burned and trying to place nicely timed attacks in between the chaos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

You're able to beat the game solo, no problems. It's built around the online play but it isn't intrusive on the gameplay. There's nice touches like the SOS flare if you run into problems with a quest and want to ask the online players to help you. So it's really dependant on how you want to play, most of the gameplay is a loop. Go on this quest to kill this monster, use loot from monster to make better gear, a little grind since you need to kill a monster more then once to make a set of armour or such. 

 

Short and simple, you can play solo all the way through or with 3 friends. I've gone online once and I've done 17-20 missions so far. 

 

hopefully that helps some but I can't recommend this game enough. I've had the Flu the last 3-4 days and I've put about 19-20 hours in so far with it. Nothing quite like the feeling you get when your fighting a T-Rex like Monster and then a bigger Dragon like Monster drops in and starts attacking both of you with swoop attacks, charges and fire breathing attacks while you're rolling this way and that way trying not to get poisoned or burned and trying to place nicely timed attacks in between the chaos. 

thanks so much for the writeup

flu is absolutely awful this year, get better soon 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/29/2018 at 2:24 PM, carpanfan96 said:

It's pretty time consuming, especially if your hunting achievements. Most monsters or quests take between 15-45m each and there's hundreds of side quests, investigations, and other types of things to do quest wise plus over 50 monsters with more on the way plus the main story line. 

Thanks for all your input in the thread!  This does look like an amazing game.  Summer for sure =)

Good luck recovering, heard this was a pain in the tail flu season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, d-dave said:

Thanks for all your input in the thread!  This does look like an amazing game.  Summer for sure =)

Good luck recovering, heard this was a pain in the tail flu season.

It is a very amazing game,but I've been playing MH for about 10 years so i might be a bit biased. I can say for sure this one fixes a lot of nitpicky issues ive had with previous entries. Probably my favorite game ive played over the last two or three years and isn't that close expect for maybe BOTW. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...