Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spagnuolo claims Patriots knew Eagles' signals in Super Bowl XXXIX


Palmetto

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, JARROD said:

What facts? That they win all the time?

That a former coach knew what they were doing and outed them for it...

That they had an employee caught videotaping signals on the sideline...

That they had a former employee in possession of practice videotape...

That two employees were caught deflating footballs (and had text messages on their phone confirming it)...

That numerous coaches have had audio issues that magically clear up when league officials come to check on them...

That the league has found enough evidence to issue fines and suspensions (including Brady's suspension that ultimately withstood legal challenge)

And yes, there's more.

Now, you can deny all this if you want, but that would make it pretty obvious that you're the one who's blinded by his bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's why Goodell had the evidence destroyed.  Imagine the NFL or a credible news source confirming that the Pats indeed stole 3 Superbowls...  the NFL was likely scared they would lose all credibility, which in turn would ruin their brand and product.  So, they destroyed the evidence so no one would ever know any different.  fug Goodell and the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was recent article about the same thing happening with the Rams written this week. Not gonna bother to link because there are several articles from different sources written recently concerning the Rams game.  That was one of the greatest upsets in Super Bowl history. To put it in perspective, the Rams were favored by whopping 17 points according to some lines. Most people still consider it one of the greatest upsets in Super Bowl history. Isaac Bruce was talking about how Patriots signed Terrell Buckley "off the street" only a  few weeks prior and he was basically always getting to the spot where the football was going when nobody had been able to cover him all year, and he didn't understand how it was possible.   Faulk did an interview a few years before that and he said their offense had prepared plays the Rams had never even run before, and Patriots were checking down on those plays during their audibles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Teach_Panther said:

 Isaac Bruce was talking about how Patriots signed Terrell Buckley "off the street" only a  few weeks prior and he was basically always getting to the spot where the football was going when nobody had been able to cover him all year, and he didn't understand how it was possible.   Faulk did an interview a few years before that and he said their offense had prepared plays the Rams had never even run before, and Patriots were checking down on those plays during their audibles.

and you believe everything these guys say? Come on man....

Terrell Buckley was on the roster for all 16 games for the 2001 Patriots.  Hell, he even intercepted Kurt Warner in the week 9 NE/StL game.

The stuff coming out from them is just full on sour grapes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2018 at 9:26 PM, thomas96 said:

They did and they knew ours and the Rams. They're known cheaters. I've moved on. They're irrelevant to me now.

They knew the 2003 Panthers signals?  And when did the Patriots glean such knowledge? The last time they played them in 2001? When George Seifert was the coach? So John Fox kept the same defense, same signals as Seifert? Thru three different defensive coordinators?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...