Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jason La Canfora reporting new GM hire


NJPanthers12

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

No, anyone who says they know is full of BS---which should hit close to home.  Time will tell.  My beef was the timing-- I am sorry these threads do not allow for illustrations to assist the literacy-challenged posters. 

You are acting like you know...even the timing didn't turn out to be as bad as first thought...words are illustrations yours were just bad ones on this pt...it happens...no biggie...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

People sure have short memories. DG was dealing with stupid MH contracts nearly the entire time he was here.  Marty showed time and time again that he was out of his league, like when the Colts knew that the Panthers were in love with Armanti Edwards so they bluffed picking him. MH trades up--for a small school, diminutive QB that he planned to use as a WR and in a gimmick offense.

Maybe his best move (after giving in to Rivera and drafting Cam) was to sign Jake Delhomme to his first contract with the Panthers.  But in true Marty Hurney fashion, his worst move was Jake's second contract with the Panthers.  It was stupid, emotional, and financially irresponsible on every level.

What more do you need than this:  He traded the team's #1 WR for future draft picks during a playoff run .  (not that I liked KB, but there was nothing much behind him).  Who does that? 

 

You made the  KB trade proof of your argument...then admitted you didnt know if it was good or bad yet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Still think it was great timing. It's not what was behind KB but the fact he was playing with Funchess and the team liked Funchess more. 

 

You don't play two Wrs with the same route tree, it was stupid. Didn't want to bench him as that would have been worse for the team as it would've been less likely to get something of value for him after the season. 

 

Flat out it was a good move

 according to this logic (which is solid logic and I agree 100%) the trade was needed but the timing was not perfect.  This move should have been made in the off season OR if we tanked the season.  This ain't Madden. There is a message you send the team.  We were in a playoff run.

I never liked KB and Funchess and I agree 100% about the route trees, etc.  Here is my theory, and I think there is something to it.  Can't prove it, but nothing anyone says here can be, fwiw.

  • RR did not like KB.  He was not a hard worker, he made mental mistakes, etc.  The only  evidence I have of this is watching OTAs and there was a game last year when he was benched--words were exchanged. 
  • Marty negotiated a contract extension for RR.  He knew the contract would give RR some input into the new GM search.
  • The trade was to show loyalty to RR--that he would get rid of his headache. 
  • The timing of the trade was due to his status as interim GM.  He wanted to earn RR's trust, address a problem (as you mention so well), and show people he could deal.
  • Who knew all this, who knew about the RR/Benji friction?  Brandon Beane, a young, aggressive GM who knows this organization better than MH.  Coincidence? 
  • So Marty traded away his #1 WR to a team making a playoff run that needed one in mid season when the Panthers were weak at WR.  We simply did not have an answer to the loss.  The trade is understandable, but the timing is very suspect. 

I could make similar cases of MH trying to save his job when it was on the line, by trading away first rounders like they were nothing--something he had never done until his butt was on the line.  The result of some of his "mortgage the future" moves?  Jeff Otah, Everette Brown, Frank Alexander, Armanti Edwards...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

 according to this logic (which is solid logic and I agree 100%) the trade was needed but the timing was not perfect.  This move should have been made in the off season OR if we tanked the season.  This ain't Madden. There is a message you send the team.  We were in a playoff run.

I never liked KB and Funchess and I agree 100% about the route trees, etc.  Here is my theory, and I think there is something to it.  Can't prove it, but nothing anyone says here can be, fwiw.

  • RR did not like KB.  He was not a hard worker, he made mental mistakes, etc.  The only  evidence I have of this is watching OTAs and there was a game last year when he was benched--words were exchanged. 
  • Marty negotiated a contract extension for RR.  He knew the contract would give RR some input into the new GM search.
  • The trade was to show loyalty to RR--that he would get rid of his headache. 
  • The timing of the trade was due to his status as interim GM.  He wanted to earn RR's trust, address a problem (as you mention so well), and show people he could deal.
  • Who knew all this, who knew about the RR/Benji friction?  Brandon Beane, a young, aggressive GM who knows this organization better than MH.  Coincidence? 
  • So Marty traded away his #1 WR to a team making a playoff run that needed one in mid season when the Panthers were weak at WR.  We simply did not have an answer to the loss.  The trade is understandable, but the timing is very suspect. 

I could make similar cases of MH trying to save his job when it was on the line, by trading away first rounders like they were nothing--something he had never done until his butt was on the line.  The result of some of his "mortgage the future" moves?  Jeff Otah, Everette Brown, Frank Alexander, Armanti Edwards...."

Otah and Alexander were good...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

You are acting like you know...even the timing didn't turn out to be as bad as first thought...words are illustrations yours were just bad ones on this pt...it happens...no biggie...

The timing, under any circumstance, is not ideal in mid-season.  It is called Chemistry--something you probably failed many times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pimpdaddy said:

...only indicator needed of Hurneys body of work, worth and reputation is nobody beat his door down to hire him.... tells you all you need to know. ....hes a hack reporter who won the lotto... GET. OUT.

See ms13 its not hard...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...