Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sopranos Prequel


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://variety.com/2018/film/news/sopranos-movie-prequel-david-chase-1202721680/

New Line is developing a movie prequel, currently titled “The Many Saints of Newark,” penned by David Chase. Chase, who created the hit HBO series, wrote the screenplay with fellow “Sopranos” scribe Lawrence Konner.

Some fan-favorite characters from “The Sopranos” are expected to appear in the film — set in the era of the Newark riots in the 60s, when African-Americans and Italians were adversaries. Rivalries turned deadly once gangsters from each side got involved.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my father lived through the newark riots. i always loved how the sopranos was centered around essex county and all the landmarks around it that i’m familiar with; the local dialect, etc. the show had a lot of realism and accuracy to it that made up for some of the unrealistic aspects of crime dramas.

i’m thinking this is going to be centered around dickie moltisanti bc “molti santi” is “many saints” in italian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i honestly couldn’t tell you if i liked season 5 more than 4 or the other way around. things definitely took a darker turn in s3. the first two were comparably more hollywood in tone and character development, also the violence in those first two seasons was kind of campy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, frash.exe said:

i honestly couldn’t tell you if i liked season 5 more than 4 or the other way around. things definitely took a darker turn in s3. the first two were comparably more hollywood in tone and character development, also the violence in those first two seasons was kind of campy.

I wonder what influence 9/11 had on the show 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/10/2018 at 6:08 AM, Donald LaFell said:

I wonder what influence 9/11 had on the show 

that’s certainly an interesting question. some of the dialogue mentions 9/11 (like when bobby starts talking to tony about nostradamus, or when tony beats up georgie bc he was making light of a terrorist threat that tony was theorizing about,) and there’s at least one minor storyline that plays on post 9/11 islamophobia where tony reports two arabic associates of christopher’s to agent harris just bc he wants to have a tighter connection with someone in the FBI. it ends up paying off for tony at the end of the series bc he gets an important tip from harris about phil’s whereabouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a question.  Could Coby White be a solid replacement for Ball? Seems he could be an upgrade. Seems he played well in replacement of Ball.  I normally get the highlights and don't get to see any games but I liked when White was on on the court. 
    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
×
×
  • Create New...