Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Texans Owner Defends Jerry Richardson


Paa Langfart

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, thomas96 said:

Misinterpretation 

I agree with interpretation as an issue, Mcnair probably had a few more choice words to refer kneeling players as, but Criminals/Inmates is probably as PG it gets for those of his ilk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rico6 said:

Oh I'm sure, that's why so many people let the comment slide and weren't offended at all. Yup.

Question - Don't know how old you are, but I'm guessing probably twenties, but have you ever heard the old phrase (I emphasize old here because it has clearly gone out the window): "sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me" Think we could instill a little more of that logic back in our society?  There might be a lot less "offended" people in the world, and people committing heinous acts of violence - ya know like back in the old, anti-progressive days....

I blame skinny jeans for the daffodil society in which we now live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Panthers4real said:

Question - Don't know how old you are, but I'm guessing probably twenties, but have you ever heard the old phrase (I emphasize old here because it has clearly gone out the window): "sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me" Think we could instill a little more of that logic back in our society?  There might be a lot less "offended" people in the world, and people committing heinous acts of violence - ya know like back in the old, anti-progressive days....

I blame skinny jeans for the daffodil society in which we now live.

fug off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Panthers4real said:

Question - Don't know how old you are, but I'm guessing probably twenties, but have you ever heard the old phrase (I emphasize old here because it has clearly gone out the window): "sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me" Think we could instill a little more of that logic back in our society?  There might be a lot less "offended" people in the world, and people committing heinous acts of violence - ya know like back in the old, anti-progressive days....

I blame skinny jeans for the daffodil society in which we now live.

Well if this isn't some trite nonsense.

Why can't I just say ignorant poo and no one cares anymore?!?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Floppin said:

Well if this isn't some trite nonsense.

Why can't I just say ignorant poo and no one cares anymore?!?!?!

May be "trite" (that's a popular word here - I like it) but am I wrong?  No need to answer, this is a rhetorical question.  You are entitled to your opinion, just as I am to mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Panthers4real said:

May be "trite" (that's a popular word here - I like it) but am I wrong?  No need to answer, this is a rhetorical question.  You are entitled to your opinion, just as I am to mine.

You can't really be "wrong", in a literal sense, when you only throw out a "might" speculation. You can, however, be incredibly stupid in doing so.

By all means, attempt to show me how there were "less offended people" back in the "anti-progressive days" - whenever the fug that might have been (can you define the era exactly for us please?)

Are you sure there were less offended people, or was it just that they didn't have a voice of dissent that anyone else gave a poo about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Floppin said:

You can't really be "wrong", in a literal sense, when you only throw out a "might" speculation. You can, however, be incredibly stupid in doing so.

I will easily throw out the word might as history proves this logic to be true.  Just look at the facts on when this "trite nonsense" was the rule not the exception - there was a lot less bull poo in this world that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthers4real said:

I will easily throw out the word might as history proves this logic to be true.  Just look at the facts on when this "trite nonsense" was the rule not the exception - there was a lot less bull poo in this world that's for sure.

show your work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
    • Season tickets aren't affordable anymore definitely when they've been so bad for 8 years before last season. When I started going my seats were front row uppers for like 38 bucks. Those seats are 100 dollars now. Teams make their money from tv, if I was an owner my goal would be to break even on tickets and concessions. 
×
×
  • Create New...