Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 REASONS WHY WE LOST TO THE SAINTS

juliosantos

By juliosantos,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

steven8989 Newbie

steven8989

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

 Warning!  This is hard to rewatch. Clay dropping balls.  Bersin getting tackled by the turf monster. Wtf.  Oh and I forgot about Adams wonderful interception that he should have batted down.  And nothing but Fg’s in the first half.   

Brees seemed to connect with like 32 different receivers. Us?  Funch, Olsen, and CMC. I sure hope Norv can create more options with the new guys that this sorry show of receiving talent.  

 

That was another play missed by officiating because that was not an interception by Adams. I was going freaking crazy because he never had control and the play should have been reviewed and the ball would have been near midfield. It was under two minutes and the damn league should have been looking at that and changed the call. That cost us about 15 more yards he never had control. I don't care what anyone says or this Taints fan on here saintsforlife says but we would have won both games at the dome if not for sorry ass refs. We will come back and own the south this year!!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saints4lifeagain Rookie

saints4lifeagain

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, steven8989 said:

That was another play missed by officiating because that was not an interception by Adams. I was going freaking crazy because he never had control and the play should have been reviewed and the ball would have been near midfield. It was under two minutes and the damn league should have been looking at that and changed the call. That cost us about 15 more yards he never had control. I don't care what anyone says or this Taints fan on here saintsforlife says but we would have won both games at the dome if not for sorry ass refs. We will come back and own the south this year!!!!

 

Saints vs. Panthers in 2017: 1-0

Refs vs. Panthers in 2017: 2-0

Panthers: 0-3

You were winless, regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoobyPls Veteran

GoobyPls

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, top dawg said:

Even if they are "mediocre secondary players," I will take that considering what we've had the last couple of years. Furthermore, Jackson and Elder are unknowns, but there's reason to be encouraged (especially in Jackson's case). Moreover, the book isn't finished on Bradberry. 

Anyone will take that, but it’s not gonna be that big of a jump, we will still be a bottom 10 secondary unless our pass rush becomes dominant. Jackson and Elder have never taken a snap in the nfl and are playing one of the hardest positions to transition too, I’m not expecting much. Bradberry is the only non jag in our secondary 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bewonee Newbie

bewonee

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Snake said:

Star was a slightly above average DT. For once we lost a good player and replaced them with a great one. Poe and KK prob are the most athletic DT duo in the league. They will cause fits for OCs. 

star was above average from 2013-2015. he was a liability afterwards regardless of his runstopping, he was one dimensional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Cam Jackson

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
    • SmokinwithWilly
      At this point its Sadiq or bust... A

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      But is it about letting Bryce develop or about winning games? Bryce has not been good enough to be an uncontested starter. He just hasn't. How many times has last drive Bryce shown up for 4 entire quarters? Once in 3 seasons? You aren't going to win 9 or 10 one score games every season year in and year out. You may want Bryce in the last 2 minutes. I want that Bryce the full 60.  No one is saying you have to give up on him, but bringing in another QB that can do anything is not hindering Bryce. It helps the team and that's where the focus needs to be. If drafting Sadiq to plague the middle of the field would help out offense, but Bryce struggles to get pass into the middle of the field, is Sadiq a bad pick? Or could he be a good pick with a better option at QB? We can't be afraid to improve. QB, TE, OL, LB, DL, CB, S. It doesn't matter. The goal is SBs, not 5 to 8 years seeing waiting to see if Bryce can develop while the rest of the league keeps passing us by.  Sadiq is a nice option, but I think we have to address tackle if one we like is there because we are painfully thin after this year, a LB to general the field, and a true ball hawking safety that can set the tone in the secondary. Those 3 positions are bigger game changers than a TE that will likely struggle to make a round 1 impact in this offense. 
    • Stumpy
      Canes vs Lightning 7pm

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Lil Stanky 100% in the dot tonight... And our 2nd line has been our best offensive line this season. Maybe our 2C really was on the roster this whole time...?
×
×
  • Create New...