Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 REASONS WHY WE LOST TO THE SAINTS

juliosantos

By juliosantos,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

steven8989 Newbie

steven8989

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

 Warning!  This is hard to rewatch. Clay dropping balls.  Bersin getting tackled by the turf monster. Wtf.  Oh and I forgot about Adams wonderful interception that he should have batted down.  And nothing but Fg’s in the first half.   

Brees seemed to connect with like 32 different receivers. Us?  Funch, Olsen, and CMC. I sure hope Norv can create more options with the new guys that this sorry show of receiving talent.  

 

That was another play missed by officiating because that was not an interception by Adams. I was going freaking crazy because he never had control and the play should have been reviewed and the ball would have been near midfield. It was under two minutes and the damn league should have been looking at that and changed the call. That cost us about 15 more yards he never had control. I don't care what anyone says or this Taints fan on here saintsforlife says but we would have won both games at the dome if not for sorry ass refs. We will come back and own the south this year!!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saints4lifeagain Rookie

saints4lifeagain

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, steven8989 said:

That was another play missed by officiating because that was not an interception by Adams. I was going freaking crazy because he never had control and the play should have been reviewed and the ball would have been near midfield. It was under two minutes and the damn league should have been looking at that and changed the call. That cost us about 15 more yards he never had control. I don't care what anyone says or this Taints fan on here saintsforlife says but we would have won both games at the dome if not for sorry ass refs. We will come back and own the south this year!!!!

 

Saints vs. Panthers in 2017: 1-0

Refs vs. Panthers in 2017: 2-0

Panthers: 0-3

You were winless, regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoobyPls Mentor

GoobyPls

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, top dawg said:

Even if they are "mediocre secondary players," I will take that considering what we've had the last couple of years. Furthermore, Jackson and Elder are unknowns, but there's reason to be encouraged (especially in Jackson's case). Moreover, the book isn't finished on Bradberry. 

Anyone will take that, but it’s not gonna be that big of a jump, we will still be a bottom 10 secondary unless our pass rush becomes dominant. Jackson and Elder have never taken a snap in the nfl and are playing one of the hardest positions to transition too, I’m not expecting much. Bradberry is the only non jag in our secondary 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bewonee Newbie

bewonee

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Snake said:

Star was a slightly above average DT. For once we lost a good player and replaced them with a great one. Poe and KK prob are the most athletic DT duo in the league. They will cause fits for OCs. 

star was above average from 2013-2015. he was a liability afterwards regardless of his runstopping, he was one dimensional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...