Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick slants/ timing routes


Jase

Recommended Posts

Why don't we do them anymore?

It wasn't too long ago that we were one of the best slant passing teams in the league. They're a great way to open up the run early in the game, which in turn is great at opening up play action.

Plus it gets smitty and moose going early in the game so the pep stays in their step for longer.

Plus it minimizes the risk of interception and wears down the defensive backs.

Why did we stop? :smash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't we do them anymore?

It wasn't too long ago that we were one of the best slant passing teams in the league. They're a great way to open up the run early in the game, which in turn is great at opening up play action.

Plus it gets smitty and moose going early in the game so the pep stays in their step for longer.

Plus it minimizes the risk of interception and wears down the defensive backs.

Why did we stop? :smash:

because Dameyune Craig is not playing anymore??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quick release passing game is the only option at this point. Dropping back and heaving long is a wasted down. No team honestly thinks that Jake to Smith is a threat anymore because jake can't throw that pass.

passing on 1st and 2nd off play action may work if we go for the 5-10 yard quick hitter but if we rely on 3rd-10 passing that will not get it done. Anytime the other team knows we are throwing we don't have a chance of completing the pass.

Utilize the quick slants and throws to RB to act almost as a run play. Lets face the facts, we will not hit big plays in the pass game. We are a grind it out, control the clock, win by 3 team. I can live with that but we have to call games that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't we do them anymore?

It wasn't too long ago that we were one of the best slant passing teams in the league. They're a great way to open up the run early in the game, which in turn is great at opening up play action.

Plus it gets smitty and moose going early in the game so the pep stays in their step for longer.

Plus it minimizes the risk of interception and wears down the defensive backs.

Why did we stop? :smash:

I agree, but JMO Fox and the staff don't trust Jake's accuracy enough to throw these passes without getting picked off. It sucks, I know, I truly can't think of any other reason why our offense is so limited other than our shoody QB play. Our offense gives "vanilla" a bad name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quick release passing game is the only option at this point. Dropping back and heaving long is a wasted down. No team honestly thinks that Jake to Smith is a threat anymore because jake can't throw that pass.

passing on 1st and 2nd off play action may work if we go for the 5-10 yard quick hitter but if we rely on 3rd-10 passing that will not get it done. Anytime the other team knows we are throwing we don't have a chance of completing the pass.

Utilize the quick slants and throws to RB to act almost as a run play. Lets face the facts, we will not hit big plays in the pass game. We are a grind it out, control the clock, win by 3 team. I can live with that but we have to call games that way.

True, but this would require a coach willing to think outside of the box, and Fox is clearly is not such a coach. We can be a better ball-control offense if we used a smarter passing game as you mentioned, but it appears Fox is incapable or unwilling to consider it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, but JMO Fox and the staff don't trust Jake's accuracy enough to throw these passes without getting picked off. It sucks, I know, I truly can't think of any other reason why our offense is so limited other than our shoody QB play. Our offense gives "vanilla" a bad name.

The slant is one of the throws that Jake throws very well... that and the deep in are his signature throws. (If he actually has such a thing as a signature throw)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The slant is one of the throws that Jake throws very well... that and the deep in are his signature throws.

I can't disagree with you here, but I suspect alot of this is Fox's aversion to trying anything he considers "unsafe". Remember, this is the same coach that once said "a punt is not a bad thing". If the Panthers could successfully run the ball 95% of the time and throw it 2-3 per game, it would suit him just fine. I'd rather see us run the wildcat, wishbone or triple option offensse than see Jake attempt anymore passes to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jake's deep ball sucks, but he can still rip out some quick lasers some of the shorter stuff - throwing the ball to a specific point rather than over someone's head where touch is required. slants would be the perfect remedy, IMO.

I agree.

When the guy has to throw a pass that requires touch, it is awful. If we give him throws that require timing and throwing to a spot he can do ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, whatever happened to throwing to the back shoulder? That was our entire offense when Henning was here, why did we stop? That was the Delhomme to Smith bread and butter.

That throw in bracket coverage gets intercepted. A lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...