Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TD is missed and will be missed.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

TD's suspension cost us this game. You can say this and that, but when it comes down to it, the defense was soft and Luke was out of position trying to cover for Mayo and Shaq. If TD was there, a few of those breakaway runs would have been stopped at the line.

 

I agree with this. Don't know if it's right or wrong but I believe TD would have made a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were lucky to even have both Shaq and Luke on the field. Imagine it without even one of them as well.

 

I really hope when TD comes back they all 3 stay healthy for the rest of the year. All we have else is Bradberry. 1 Corner Back who can play consistent against the leagues best.. which we play a lot of them. We have Short in the middle. We have Part Time Peppers on the edge. without those 3 LBs were not much of a Defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Addison and Horton pkayed good its just that well. Holding and all negated the line and Refs loojing thw other way. I say the turning point was on the Ridley phantom PI jJackson was just catching up to Ridley when he fell. That gave Atl just enough spark and awaken Ridley.

I dont know if team was distracted by the Hurricane but no one except a handful of players on both sides of the ball came to play. Shaq definitely played poorly right along with #41. I got tired of seeing him teailing the wr and someone else making the tackles.Why cant we play elder some in his position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, bull123 said:

One thing for sure...Shaq not getting it done...especially liked Ryan running right thru him at goal line....worse than pathetic 

Totally unacceptable! Shaq's tackling is suspect in my opinion. He is a question mark at times, while Thomas Davis is an exclamation point damn near everytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...