Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Elliot Harrison’s power rankings after week 3


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

I think some site had us at #4 in the power rankings (will try to find the link), saw something in passing on Twitter.

I have witnessed a FIRST on Twitter and the Huddle.

Panthers fans complaining we're ranked TOO HIGH!!!!  Never thought I'd see that.

But seriously, it IS shocking...  I never guessed we'd be catapulted up the standings like this on a lot of lists.  I'd probably put us around #7 or #8 personally... but it's hard to know.  Still way too early to really pay attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't rank us above the Rams and Chiefs who look legit. You can't rank us above the Eagles who have the same record as us, but are the defending SB champs. You can't rank us above the Saints who look like the exact same team that beat us 3x last year. But name me another team that should be ranked ahead of us. #5 is very fair and where I'd put us too. I keep seeing the Jags ahead of us, but they've looked pretty bad in 2 games and are currently hanging their hat on beating a, let's face it, pretty bad Pats team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moorgan said:

Atlanta torched us on the ground. Remember the snapping of the run game streak? We had a bad game that day. Hoping it was an aberration.

The Bengals torched also torched us on the ground.  They just didn't get to run as much as the Falcons did.

Ironically, we shut down the best back we have faced (Elliot).  I have a feeling its due to our defensive focus in the last two games being on slowing down the passing game.  Worked ok against Cincy, not so much against Atlanta.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The Bengals torched also torched us on the ground.  They just didn't get to run as much as the Falcons did.

Ironically, we shut down the best back we have faced (Elliot).  I have a feeling its due to our defensive focus in the last two games being on slowing down the passing game.  Worked ok against Cincy, not so much against Atlanta.  

Didn't Gio only have like less than 70 yards? They did gash us here and there but I don't think it amounted to a whole lot. I could be wrong though.

EDIT: Yeah they had 66 yds total, rushing. Gio had 61. They definitely did not torch us on the ground. They only had 13 rushing attempts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

Didn't Gio only have like less than 70 yards? They did gash us here and there but I don't think it amounted to a whole lot. I could be wrong though.

Bengals had a total of 66 yards rushing, of which 61 yards were by Gio (averaged 5.1 yards / carry).

45 yards came on 2 rushes:

1853477220_Capture_CincyRun.PNG.7f5da5daad09188e10b077b852312e4a.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

Didn't Gio only have like less than 70 yards? They did gash us here and there but I don't think it amounted to a whole lot. I could be wrong though.

EDIT: Yeah they had 66 yds total, rushing. Gio had 61. They definitely did not torch us on the ground. They only had 13 rushing attempts.

I was looking at ypc.  They averaged over 5 ypc.  They just didn't run it as much, in part because they got behind.  On their first drive, Bernard had 6 rushes, 1 yard, 7 yards, 9 yards, 4, yards, 4 yards, and 1 yard for a td.  His first run of the second half was for 23 yards. He had a 22 yard run towards the end of the third quarter.  After that, he only ran the ball two more times.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...