Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best kicker in franchise history


Randolph Panther

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Kasay never needed a 2nd kicker to light a fire under his ass because he was so terrible. Only time we needed an extra kicker with Kasay here is for kickoffs and the punter couldn't do them as well. Kasay's FG kicking was too reliable to cut him. Just about every year for Gano everyone, including the coaches, have had wavering confidence in Gano. Remember when Rivera chose to punt from the opponents territory instead of kicking a FG a few seasons ago? Confidence in Kasay was never an issue. Everyone believed in him.

Can you back that up? Big statement to make for a kicker who kicked 63.6% at one point in his career, with only 6 FGs 40 or longer and zero 50 or longer that year. That's a full 5% lower than Gano (for the sake of this discussion) in his worst year, which included 14 attempts 40 or longer and 6 50 or longer.

Again, I love John Kasay and his status in the organization is beyond question. I just don't see the harm in acknowledging that Gano is an excellent kicker as well, arguably better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

No he hasn't. Gano usually chokes under clutch situations where Kasay usually was money. Kasay is one of the best kickers in NFL history. Without him in 2003, we wouldn't have been in the Super Bowl. Gano has cost us playoff games. Kasay has also made 43 50 plus FGs while Gano has only made 19.

He had one off year with an amputated foot and he’s been the definition of clutch prior to and after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Smithers said:

You must not have been a fan when Kasay played here.  Gano isn’t even close to JK.

Sure your not speaking to me. I have probably been around alot longer than you. I have been a fan since day one.  Went to the first game against the Rams at Clemson in 1995.  Gano certainly is close to JK.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ncsfinest21 said:

He could've hit that from 67. Only thing is at 67 it would've went right but he put the boot on that one

It went through about midway of the goal post and hit the net.. That was probably good from 73. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChibCU said:

I'm not a Gano fan and I'd have to say he's a better kicker than Kasay was while here.

 

We had to waste an active roster spot to f'ing field two kickers. Kasay also lost us the Super Bowl.

= to Jake vs the Cardinals. A very unKasay like day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...