Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TO from negative, Props to the following

Popsickle

By Popsickle,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Popsickle Proficient

Popsickle

Posted
Posted

I hate RR as much as the next player, but I felt it was necessary to start a thread to thank the players that balled out. 

Cam played greatish 25/30 250 yards and a couple of TDs one horrible int. 

CMC; my old ass Ti-84 Calculator only reported an error when I tried to add his yards together it was so much. 

DJ and Curtis both played well and demonstrated there amazing abilities. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

I wouldn't even say that interception was awul. It was more or less just a gunslinger mentality, honestly not even a bad decision. Cam knows the only way the Panthers would win was being up by multiple scores.

It wasn’t awful. What was awful was that we designed a play for our third string TE who has caught one pass all year run straight down the field. The db made a great play, a better wr could have got a hand on it to disrupt. It wasn’t a good decision, but it should not have been Manhertz 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
Just now, The Lobo said:

It wasn’t awful. What was awful was that we designed a play for our third string TE who has caught one pass all year run straight down the field. The db made a great play, a better wr could have got a hand on it to disrupt. It wasn’t a good decision, but it should not have been Manhertz 

Yeah, I don't understand why they're playing Manhertz. I don't think Manhertz would make it onto the roster of any other team in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mr. Scot
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Also, just for clarity, is this thread meant for general discussion of Bryce Young, or discussion of General Bryce Young?  
    • Mr. Scot
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      The word I feel most comfortable using as a descriptor is "inconsistent". Haven't really seen anyone disagree with that. Consistency being one of the things I value most in a player, that makes me lean toward moving on. But he does still have both time and opportunity to prove otherwise. Mind you, having a streaky quarterback isn't exactly a new thing in Charlotte (you could argue it's been the norm). Delhomme was notorious for starting slow but finishing strong. He could sadly also find hos way into ruts that were difficult to crawl out of. Newton, on the other hand, was often known to start hot but fade late (the vast majority of the 2015 season followed that pattern) though it could be argued that was a team pattern as much as it was Cam's.  There are definitely some fans for whom this is always going to be a bridge too far. (or too short) Realistically, it's not impossible that he could still have a good career even with those issues. It's a damn sight more difficult, though. And arguably, less likely.
    • Mr. Scot
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Oh, I did, and they weren't based in emotions either. Granted, characterizing them that way gives you an easy out to avoid responding to them. Similar tactic to dismissing the other guy's points with "nah, you didn't really watch the games" which saves you having to debate what he said. Strikes me as a kinda lazy way to go, but hey both elements are still back there if you feel up to trying later.
×
×
  • Create New...