Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Twitter Thread on Cam Newton's Performance against the Bucs (Hint: the o-line sucked)


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Just saw a twitter thread on Cam Newton attempting to make stuff out of nothing with an offensive line that was the equivalent of swiss cheese.

This one in particular really stood out:

Every oline got beat. Moton may have been the closest to being able to stop someone, and that's pretty sad on that rep. 

Again, if Cam's bad, chances are a whole lot of other factors are in play that led him to be bad. This is an outright atrocity to watch what he had to go through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Just saw a twitter thread on Cam Newton attempting to make stuff out of nothing with an offensive line that was the equivalent of swiss cheese.

This one in particular really stood out:

Every oline got beat. Moton may have been the closest to being able to stop someone, and that's pretty sad on that rep. 

Again, if Cam's bad, chances are a whole lot of other factors are in play that led him to be bad. This is an outright atrocity to watch what he had to go through.

Cmc was averaging 10  ypc so why did he get only 10 carries while cam and the pass blocking was off? Blame the playcalls?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam made some mistakes this game let’s be honest. But the o-line was trash and he’s due for a bad game. Especially when he’s carrying Ron’s sorry ass on his back when he constantly forces Cam into multiple game saving situations each week. Sorry but you’re bound to lose out on those no matter who you’ve got playing for you, eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OneBadCat said:

Cam made some mistakes this game let’s be honest. But the o-line was trash and he’s due for a bad game. Especially when he’s carrying Ron’s sorry ass on his back when he constantly forces Cam into multiple game saving situations each week. Sorry but you’re bound to lose out on those no matter who you’ve got playing for you eventually.

If this was the cowboys message board and zeke only got 10 carries they would be asking them to feed the rb. Cmc is averaging 5.3 ypc and averaged 10 ypc this game but only got 10 carries Yet Cam was asked to keep passing even tho he was struggling Bad strategy imo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Good grief, Chris Clark looks positively weird getting out of his stance. 

I swear, he looks more like a guy who jumped back because he saw something scary on the ground than a guy getting set up to block.

I have no idea why the team thought it'll be a great idea to get someone off their couch to protect Cam's blind side when we had an able-bodied tackle that seemingly did well in the spot in the pre-season and is young enough that can develop into a bookend tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tarheelpride said:

I have no idea why the team thought it'll be a great idea to get someone off their couch to protect Cam's blind side when we had an able-bodied tackle that seemingly did well in the spot in the pre-season and is young enough that can develop into a bookend tackle.

Got me. Any time I watch film on Clark, I always find myself asking how the hell he got an NFL contract. He may not have been the world's greatest lineman, but even Byron Bell was better getting set up to block than this guy.

Thank God for Norv Turner. If he hadn't successfully coached Cam to get the foitball out quicker than in past years, Newton might have been out for the season by week six.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Silent Majority said:

Did Clark bend down and pick something up in the fuging middle of the play, as Cam is running for his life and trying to complete that pass on the sideline? Or am I tripping?

Was trying to figure that out myself.

I don't know if he thought the play was over or what, but he basically stopped participating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Silent Majority said:

Agreed. It was weird.

Would that this were all there was...

Fahey actually posted some other clips that Saca didn't copy over here. The running theme on all of them is that when Clark jumps up out of his stance, his base is too narrow and he looks off balance (almost like he's about to fall backward).

There's a pretty funny shot of McCaffrey trucking a guy while Clark sits back and watches, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...