Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bulls looking to make trades..


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Quote

The Bulls are in a dealmaking mode, shopping center Robin Lopez and forward Jabari Parker in trade talks, sources told ESPN.

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25678987/memphis-grizzlies-acquire-justin-holiday-chicago-bulls-wayne-selden-marshon-brooks-picks

Anything that gets us out from under the Batum contract is a WIN right now.. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ychzs3yz
Two 1st Rnd picks + Frank + Batum = Lopez + Parker

PG - Kemba - Parker
SG - Lamb - Monk
SF - MKG - Bridges
PF - Parker - Marvin
C - Lopez - Willy/Zeller

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The Bulls and Parker’s representative are working to find a trade scenario that works for both parties. As of now, league sources indicated that teams interested in Parker are asking the Bulls to take on bad, long-term contracts. As of now, that’s a non-starter for the Bulls, who structured Parker’s deal the way they did for a reason.

welp..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hornets definitely one of those teams asking lol. Probably shopping Batum around the entire league.

I'm all for trading two firsts if it lets us dump him. Sucks but I have more faith in Kemba attracting free agents than I have in the next two mid-1st rookies turning this ship around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25678987/memphis-grizzlies-acquire-justin-holiday-chicago-bulls-wayne-selden-marshon-brooks-picks

Anything that gets us out from under the Batum contract is a WIN right now.. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ychzs3yz
Two 1st Rnd picks + Frank + Batum = Lopez + Parker

PG - Kemba - Parker
SG - Lamb - Monk
SF - MKG - Bridges
PF - Parker - Marvin
C - Lopez - Willy/Zeller

Are you trolling with that?  Hell no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

I'm in the mind that we have to rid ourselves of Batum's contract now OR see it all the way to the end - and then Rebuild..

I hear you, totally agree but in reality I seriously doubt we can unload him without taking back a bum just like him in return.  If we cut a year or two of salary in the deal, we start attaching 1st rounders.  Basically what u said but not into it.  Batum stinks but he is our stink.

Kup can’t be dumb enough to think attaching Frank means anything, right?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not trading a first rounder in this year’s draft, let alone an additional first for Lopez and Parker.

It’s very deep draft and if we start to slide I’d rather have our pick then Jabari Parker’s bum ass attitude.

Batum may be actual ass but he’s not causing locker room problems, more than I can say for Parker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I’ve grown to like Zeller and Marvin is at least serviceable for 50% of the year.

Batum and Biz are a waste of cap space.

It is literally amazing that Biz is like the exact same player he was when drafted.  You think he would get little more aware on the court over the years.  Batum is flat out ok with mediocre as hell.  

I am ok with Marvin and Zeller on their deals as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...