Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL, technology, and the future


PantherBrew

Recommended Posts

This Saints/Rams debacle has got me thinking about the future of the NFL.  

Now, one could argue very convincingly that the NFL is super excited about this past weekend. The drama! The arguments! The attention.  Why would they want to change any of that?  Well, they have made some changes with technology over the years, with replay being the most glaring.  

My questions are:

  • What technology would you like to see implemented?  
  • How would it change the game? 
  • What are some potential problems (think about what motivates the NFL [viewers] and if it would hurt the drama or action)'
  • What do you think the chances are your hope happens.  

Ill go first.  

 

I want to see technology where ball spotting, touchdowns, and first downs are all done by computer tracking.  I feel like this is an area where there is the most potential for corruption or incompetence.  Whether this needs to happen with lasers, computer chips, or whatever I would love to see it be known in an instant where the ball is spotted and what is needed.  Now, I think this is harder than it sounds for ball spotting.  It might be difficult to know when a player is technically down.  But this is where the officials come into play.  They need to have a clicker on hand that is pressed when the runner is thought to be down or progress stopped.  This could also be reviewable in important situations.   But the main thing would be the chip in the ball and the spotting would be base on what computer info tells the officials.  Also to go with this, I think there should be more real-time communication with officials in the box and officials on the field for all replay instances.  Lets help these guys out!  I think there is a very good chance of something like this happening over the next ten years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I posted this in another thread, but it's more appropriate here.

 

 

Thank for posting that.  That definitely relates.  I totally agree about college review being soooo much better.  

I really wouldnt mind if the head ref was wired to someone in the box with the best views of it, and could instantly be like "Bill, thats a catch". Done. In seconds, instead of the annoying minutes we spend looking at the official manually review it.  Maybe that free time could be used on subjective penalty calls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, PantherBrew said:

This Saints/Rams debacle has got me thinking about the future of the NFL.  

Now, one could argue very convincingly that the NFL is super excited about this past weekend. The drama! The arguments! The attention.  Why would they want to change any of that?  Well, they have made some changes with technology over the years, with replay being the most glaring.  

My questions are:

  • What technology would you like to see implemented?  
  • How would it change the game? 
  • What are some potential problems (think about what motivates the NFL [viewers] and if it would hurt the drama or action)'
  • What do you think the chances are your hope happens.  

Ill go first.  

 

I want to see technology where ball spotting, touchdowns, and first downs are all done by computer tracking.  I feel like this is an area where there is the most potential for corruption or incompetence.  Whether this needs to happen with lasers, computer chips, or whatever I would love to see it be known in an instant where the ball is spotted and what is needed.  Now, I think this is harder than it sounds for ball spotting.  It might be difficult to know when a player is technically down.  But this is where the officials come into play.  They need to have a clicker on hand that is pressed when the runner is thought to be down or progress stopped.  This could also be reviewable in important situations.   But the main thing would be the chip in the ball and the spotting would be base on what computer info tells the officials.  Also to go with this, I think there should be more real-time communication with officials in the box and officials on the field for all replay instances.  Lets help these guys out!  I think there is a very good chance of something like this happening over the next ten years.  

To do what you suggest is possible.  But each ball would cost a hell of a lot more money and you better believe the NFL will not want the players then handing the balls to fans.  No more Sunday giveaways.  That would take some of the fun out of a game that the NFL has tried to take all the fun out of the game that they can for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bababoey said:

To do what you suggest is possible.  But each ball would cost a hell of a lot more money and you better believe the NFL will not want the players then handing the balls to fans.  No more Sunday giveaways.  That would take some of the fun out of a game that the NFL has tried to take all the fun out of the game that they can for a while.

Yeah I guess that would be true.  Not sure how much the ball price would increase.  The ball would only need a small tracking chip, which is in pretty much everything now.  Maybe that makes the balls go from $75 to $200 - 300.  I think that would be worth it and i dont think that would keep Cam from giving them away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm honestly torn on this.

I know everybody hates when bad calls affect a game, but I'm just not one of those people that believes the game absolutely has to be perfect.

It's getting to the point where I think we're nearing overkill.

Would you rather them do away with replay all together or expand it? No middle ground. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm honestly torn on this.

I know everybody hates when bad calls affect a game, but I'm just not one of those people that believes the game absolutely has to be perfect.

It's getting to the point where I think we're nearing overkill.

And I disagree.

We have the technology to improve accuracy tenfold, why not implement it? It's the same argument Baseball had for years and it cost teams and individuals for no reason other than old people don't like change.

I'd rather they get the call right. I can stomach a loss on an overturned play if the call is right. I can't stomach a loss when some BS human error causes you to lose. 

I fail to see how something incorrect and preventable is the better option than something correct in the first place.

Vaccines are available to prevent illnesses and the spread of diseases. A handful of dumbasses are choosing not to because they're frigging idiots and they're ruining heard immunity for the rest of us

Technology to get this stuff right is available. A handful of dumbasses are choosing not to use it because they think human error makes the game better... for reasons. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PantherBrew said:

Yeah I guess that would be true.  Not sure how much the ball price would increase.  The ball would only need a small tracking chip, which is in pretty much everything now.  Maybe that makes the balls go from $75 to $200 - 300.  I think that would be worth it and i dont think that would keep Cam from giving them away. 

A few years ago they talked about this and the said the price then, about 4 or 5 years ago, would be at least $500 a ball.  They could charge $1000 a player for giving away the ball but that would be a terrible PR move and the NFL does not need any more bad PR if it can help it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

And I disagree.

We have the technology to improve accuracy tenfold, why not implement it? It's the same argument Baseball had for years and it cost teams and individuals for no reason other than old people don't like change.

I'd rather they get the call right. I can stomach a loss on an overturned play if the call is right. I can't stomach a loss when some BS human error causes you to lose. 

I fail to see how something incorrect and preventable is the better option than something correct in the first place.

Vaccines are available to prevent illnesses and the spread of diseases. A handful of dumbasses are choosing not to because they're frigging idiots and they're ruining heard immunity for the rest of us

Technology to get this stuff right is available. A handful of dumbasses are choosing not to use it because they think human error makes the game better... for reasons. 

 

If I was gambling playing black jack, and I lost a $100 or a $100,000 bet because of a dealers "human error".  I would freak out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

And I disagree.

We have the technology to improve accuracy tenfold, why not implement it? It's the same argument Baseball had for years and it cost teams and individuals for no reason other than old people don't like change.

I'd rather they get the call right. I can stomach a loss on an overturned play if the call is right. I can't stomach a loss when some BS human error causes you to lose. 

I fail to see how something incorrect and preventable is the better option than something correct in the first place.

Vaccines are available to prevent illnesses and the spread of diseases. A handful of dumbasses are choosing not to because they're frigging idiots and they're ruining heard immunity for the rest of us

Technology to get this stuff right is available. A handful of dumbasses are choosing not to use it because they think human error makes the game better... for reasons. 

 

I get the analogy, but to be fair dude vaccines are a lot more important than football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bababoey said:

A few years ago they talked about this and the said the price then, about 4 or 5 years ago, would be at least $500 a ball.  They could charge $1000 a player for giving away the ball but that would be a terrible PR move and the NFL does not need any more bad PR if it can help it.

Use the money from the NFL fines to pay for the balls.  Honestly, money especially of this sort, is not the issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, this year we should've easily been a playoff team in my opinion. We should have easily had two or three more wins--at least one--had not Bryce crapped the bed. But let's be serious about human nature and what we know about our FO. I wouldn't bet the farm that Bryce will be anything but the defacto starter in 2026, because (inconsistent though it was) we have exceeded expectations this year, and some in the FO probably believe, rightly or wrongly, that Bryce is at the center of that. You know, piece of bread seems like a meal if all you've had is a cracker. That being said, Bryce has shown plenty of inconsistency if not a downright pattern of flaws. He's a third year QB, and some, if not most, of his metrics aren't pretty. It could be argued that he should be further along (for me it's not really arguable). So, hopefully the decision makers will acquire a couple of plan Bs. I would hate it and love it if we identified "our guy" in the draft, and that it was somehow achievable to acquire him with a couple of high draft picks or even less. But we already pulled the trigger on Bryce with arguably awful results, so that's got to make the decision makers a little skittish to repeat a mistake that should be still fresh on everyone's mind. That being said, I think that it's more likely that we acquire a player like Mac Jones, Malik Willis or Trey Lance in free agency, and also target a day two or day three developmental pick in the draft with some real upside. That pick for would be Drew Allar who should slide to day three (I'm thinking). I think that this is more realistic than them releasing Bryce from his starter's role from the get-go, or someone just flat out playing themselves definitely into the starter's role by the time the season begins.  Now, again, if we can find "our guy" that changes the narrative and is expected to be the starter from day one, I'd be excited, if not downright ecstatic, but I don't think that's a realistic expectation.  Getting back to the team in general, If we don't make some improvements, including QB, I wouldn't bet that we'd necessarily be a playoff team next year, because, the rest of the NFCS is likely to improve next year. I don't expect that teams in our division will be necessarily able to "backdoor" themselves into the playoffs next season. So we're going to have to hit on at least a couple of picks, get healthy along the line, and fundamentally change the way we're calling plays because lightning probably isn't striking twice. I'm hoping that we'll have a real breakthrough season by 2028, because this season and next season aren't likely to be it because removing ball-and-chains ain't easy unless you got the key, and It's still gonna take some time to find it.
    • Necas is not the missing piece here.
×
×
  • Create New...