Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Put in an offer for a house....


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Any homeowners here want to offer some advice for a first-time homebuyer? My future wife (getting married in less than three weeks....YIKES!) put in an offer for a house in our neighborhood yesterday. Inspector on call for when they respond to our offer.

The good: Location! It's a 15-20 min commute to both of our jobs in a hot up and coming neighborhood. I've lived in the 'hood for 7+ years so I'm very familiar with the area. It's on a quiet street with a nice fenced yard. Listed about 10% below market price at asking price, but we also shaved off another 5% our offer. It was on the market for 100 days back over the summer, but they pulled it down, semi-renovated it, and re-listed. So now it has brand new windows, floors, roof, garage doors (a rare 2 car garage in a neighborhood where most houses have 1 or no garage), and updated electrical (GFCI outlets galore). AC and furnace are about 10 years old and appear in decent condition.

The bad: It's an older house with some "character". There are some minor foundation issues, but that's par for the course in this neighborhood. Nothing I'll need to fix in the next 5 years but I'll defer to the inspectors discretion on that. There are some minor cracks in the drywall and doors that don't close right which will be a perpetual problem. Honestly you can't find a house without some kind of foundation issue in this area of town, so that's not a huge deterrent because that's just how it goes if you want to live in this neighborhood. There's some flood risk. The house isn't in a flood plain, but there are no gutters and the area around the house has sunken a bit over the last 50 years. Sellers disclosure states a few years ago the back corner of the house near the laundry room flooded a bit during some heavy rains (being in Texas, not all houses are equipped for heavy rain), so they graded the backyard, put in a retaining wall by the neighbor's property line, and added in a french drain. We might add gutters in the future if we buy the place which should also help. First major fix is the driveway which needs to be repaved ASAP, since it's probably the original driveway from the 60's. Kitchen and bathrooms also need updating.

It's pretty much a blank slate of a house, a great starter home, with some issues we'll have to deal with the whole time we live there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go ahead and reach out to your insurance agent, and get a quote for flood coverage.

Put away more money in reserves than what you think you will need for repairs and upkeep.

I would look into a ram jack type business to gauge how much it would cost to level the house.

Take a good look at the plumbing if you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- No foundation issue is small. Make sure you grill your inspector on the possible short and long term costs for any foundation issues they find. 

- A lot of older homes had heating systems that used heating oil, and they'd have a tank, buried in the back yard. They're expensive to remove, so make sure if they had one, you know where it was, and have some type of proof that it was removed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally I'd say go new instead of old but the new houses they are building right now look cheap as poo (for the $$)imo. Friend bought a house for 500k and the quality and location was no better than my gfs townhouse she bought for 215k a few years back. Literally the same engineered flooring, both on slabs, kitchen cabinets were white flat paneled and not real wood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PanthersBigD said:

- No foundation issue is small. Make sure you grill your inspector on the possible short and long term costs for any foundation issues they find. 

- A lot of older homes had heating systems that used heating oil, and they'd have a tank, buried in the back yard. They're expensive to remove, so make sure if they had one, you know where it was, and have some type of proof that it was removed. 

I agree foundation issues can be big. From the houses we've looked at in this neighborhood, this one seems pretty average. The house we're renting now which is about a mile away, the slab is cracked right down the middle. This one doesn't seem as bad, but I'll wait and see after the inspection.

I don't think I've ever seen an oil tank as a heater in Central Texas. 99.9% sure it's natural gas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

I agree foundation issues can be big. From the houses we've looked at in this neighborhood, this one seems pretty average. The house we're renting now which is about a mile away, the slab is cracked right down the middle. This one doesn't seem as bad, but I'll wait and see after the inspection.

I don't think I've ever seen an oil tank as a heater in Central Texas. 99.9% sure it's natural gas.

Houses built in the 40s used oil, before the infrastructure for delivering natural gas was available. Perhaps it depends on what you consider 'old.' Maybe the house you're buying is 1970's 'old' rather than 1940's like my house. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PanthersBigD said:

Houses built in the 40s used oil, before the infrastructure for delivering natural gas was available. Perhaps it depends on what you consider 'old.' Maybe the house you're buying is 1970's 'old' rather than 1940's like my house. 

House was built in ‘65, probably gas but I’ll have the inspector verify 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, blackcat said:

Don't use an inspector that comes recommended by your realtor and don't be pushed into buying a house you're not comfortable with.  Realtors work for themselves, not you, remember that.

This is bad advice.

Have your agent, if one is involved, give you a list of 3 home inspectors, you call and speak with them, and make your decision.

To the OP, please look into those foundation issues, that's not normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

This is bad advice.

Have your agent, if one is involved, give you a list of 3 home inspectors, you call and speak with them, and make your decision.

To the OP, please look into those foundation issues, that's not normal.

Nothing wrong with going with an inspector other than ones your agent recommends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably too late for this but anyone in the market for buying a house should 100% seek out a "Buyers Only Agent".  Your agent that listed your house will tell you that is not necessary, that their agency does this all the time.  But when it gets down to the nuts and bolts, that friendly real estate agent is working for the seller, not for you.  They are obligated by law to represent the seller.

Getting a buyers only agent ensures you have someone that is involved in real estate professionally and is only obligated to look out for YOUR interests!  They are still paid by the seller at closing but are not legally obligated to them, they are to you!

Also, so many sellers list their home without doing the grunt work.  We were going to buy an older home and spent $500 for inspection only to find a laundry list of structural defects that included the need for an engineer to evaluate.  I cut my losses and ran.  I knew the seller (little old lady) so I sent her the report so she knew what to get fixed but I was not going to pay for a structural engineer to inspect her house.

You mentioned that the structural issues would not need to be addressed in the near future but they will have to be addressed eventually.  Unless you find a buyer willing to pay for those you are actually taking on the financial obligations of the current owner by not requesting repairs or credit at closing.  

Good luck.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

Probably too late for this but anyone in the market for buying a house should 100% seek out a "Buyers Only Agent".  Your agent that listed your house will tell you that is not necessary, that their agency does this all the time.  But when it gets down to the nuts and bolts, that friendly real estate agent is working for the seller, not for you.  They are obligated by law to represent the seller.

Getting a buyers only agent ensures you have someone that is involved in real estate professionally and is only obligated to look out for YOUR interests!  They are still paid by the seller at closing but are not legally obligated to them, they are to you!

Also, so many sellers list their home without doing the grunt work.  We were going to buy an older home and spent $500 for inspection only to find a laundry list of structural defects that included the need for an engineer to evaluate.  I cut my losses and ran.  I knew the seller (little old lady) so I sent her the report so she knew what to get fixed but I was not going to pay for a structural engineer to inspect her house.

You mentioned that the structural issues would not need to be addressed in the near future but they will have to be addressed eventually.  Unless you find a buyer willing to pay for those you are actually taking on the financial obligations of the current owner by not requesting repairs or credit at closing.  

Good luck.

 

Agree on the Buyers Only Agent. We went with a dual agent on our last home sale/purchase and while it worked out for us, it was a lot of work to stay on top of things and it would have been nicer to have an agent that fought more for us on the purchase side. Luckily we bought before the current boom, so our home has appreciated a ton. Still pisses me off thinking some of the little things we compromised on for expediency's sake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too worried about the agent. This was a house we picked out ourselves and checked out. Agreed that the foundation issues are definitely worth checking out. If accepted we will pay a $150 "option fee" to the seller that basically gives us a week to get the house checked out, we can pay our own private inspector and back out of the deal or accept it based on the inspection.

We got the number of an inspector that a friend of our's used when they bought their house and said he's top notch. All his online reviews are excellent and he didn't come from the agent. Definitely going to get those foundation issues looked into in depth, check for mold from the flood damage, and have the termite damage investigated. Overall the house seems in decent condition but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...