Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Clark receives $306,000 performance-based bonus


GRWatcher

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

He was better than Kalil

No, he wasn't.

Kalil may have been bad but Clark was awful. Had Kalil played, he would have benefited from the same thing Clark did (Newton's quicker release).

 

1 minute ago, My Goodness My Guinness said:

I'd take Clark on the same contract for another year as depth in a heartbeat. 

Can you guarantee Rivera wouldn't start him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bartin said:

Kind of fits a theory I have and I'm sure I'm not the only one with it. A less talented replacement can come in for a few games and perform really well because there is no tape on him with that team. Then after a few games the tape gets out, weaknesses get identified and they get exposed. Ryan Delaire would have been another example of this. Once everyone realized that literally the only thing he could do was speed rush, he got shut down after a promising first 2-3 games.

Maybe we should just bring in new players at areas of weakness every couple games...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Clark's time of "playing well" coincided with Cam Newton's time of being healthy.

I don't think he ever really looked that good. As long as Newton was getting the ball out quickly though, he could serve as a substitute speed bump.

But good grief, his footwork and technique were just horrible.

He looked so bad sometimes but busted his tail to not let his guy get by. I kinda liked him for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

No, he wasn't.

Kalil may have been bad but Clark was awful. Had Kalil played, he would have benefited from the same thing Clark did (Newton's quicker release).

 

Can you guarantee Rivera wouldn't start him?

Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The deep ball or at least the threat thereof is an absolutely essential component of success in today's NFL, and not the '20 air yard' nonsense that the NFL likes to push. Teams have to account for the field-flipping, immediate TD play or else they just sit on things. We've seen it for years now. And with respect to Brees, the latter half of his career has him as the ultimate short-game QB... and it still wasn't enough to overcome the best competition when it counted most. When that element went missing towards the second half of the 2010s they were still a deadly team when they had superior defense, but they ultimately fell to the best defenses.
    • Dude.. that sounds so sad. 
    • Bryce either finds a deep ball this year or he doesn’t.  His success hinges on that entirely. is there a successful QB currently playing that doesn’t have an accurate deep throw? there are only so many underneath plays in a playbook. if that’s all bro can do, expect a pick 6 record. Defenses are too fast and smart. A devastating run game is going to 1000% have to be the thing that keeps defense honest if Bryce’s deep ball doesn’t improve. The importance of that one attribute can not be overlooked.  I so wish people would stop insulting Brees, a top 10 first ballot HOF’er with these stupid Bryce comparisons. Brees could drop a 40 yd DIME on a rollout or from shotgun.    I want the Panthers to win. I don’t care who pilots the ship. I don’t really care about any of the individual pieces.   
×
×
  • Create New...