Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Path to the Draft - Panthers' 2019 War Room: Projecting Carolina's Selections


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

I love Brooks and Baldy but this left me confused..They are usually correct with their breakdowns on this team .............but.  ....When did we lose Moton last season??

They mean we lost Matt Kalil and Darryl at the same time at one point. Moton was listed on the left and Darryl on the right so they put both tackles behind them. Each has competition and backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JARROD said:

They mean we lost Matt Kalil and Darryl at the same time at one point. Moton was listed on the left and Darryl on the right so they put both tackles behind them. Each has competition and backup.

Yeah that's a terrible idea.. I don't know a team in NFL history that drafted 1st 2 rounds competition for both Tackle positions?? Lol

So where is the competition for Obada/cox  who most likely will be starting in our base 4/3..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

Yeah that's a terrible idea.. I don't know a team in NFL history that drafted 1st 2 rounds competition for both Tackle positions?? Lol

So where is the competition for Obada/cox  who most likely will be starting in our base 4/3..

I can’t disagree with them. If we drafted 2 DE or 2 OT or split them or split them with OT OG or DE DT or DE OLB, can’t disagree with any of them.

Hurney has double dipped plenty of times, so he’s not above it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been saying this for weeks. If the top 3 or 4 DE's are off the board, we go T. Guaranteed 1st game starter. Some D-lineman need a year or 2 to come into their own. We can get a DE in the 2nd that can "contribute and rotate" in their 1st season an develop into a FT DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JARROD said:

I can’t disagree with them. If we drafted 2 DE or 2 OT or split them or split them with OT OG or DE DT or DE OLB, can’t disagree with any of them.

Hurney has double dipped plenty of times, so he’s not above it.

You do realize we are going into this season with our best edge rushers being over 30 on 1 year deals??

And this is the best Dline draft in decades?? 

I would literally voodoo curse Hurney if he fuged up that bad.  If this was a smart plan there was no need at all in signing Dwill back..  You can keep that money draft your 2 tackles and signed another vet edge rusher..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, musicman said:

I've been saying this for weeks. If the top 3 or 4 DE's are off the board, we go T. Guaranteed 1st game starter. Some D-lineman need a year or 2 to come into their own. We can get a DE in the 2nd that can "contribute and rotate" in their 1st season an develop into a FT DE.

I have no problem if we draft J Will or Cody in the 1st (because they both can play guard) and then mix a double dip of Dlinemen and a free safety with the next 3 picks.  That's a good plan as well in my book..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...