Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting Stat


WarHeel

Recommended Posts

Let me preface by saying I believe Cam is an above average passer. Not elite, but not as sorry as some would argue. 65% completion percentage certainly isn’t horrible for the day. 

 

Rushing: 3 attempts for -2 yards. This is a 2016 Mike Tolbert stat (sorry big fella), not our franchise QB who made his name on making people look silly with his feet. 

 

I get that he’s probably rehabbing the preseason foot injury. I understand the rehabilitation side of things better than most and didn’t expect Cam to  rush for 50+ yards as he typically would be capable of on an average Sunday. But we need to talk about what happens to our offense when you take away Cam’s legs.

 

When our RB can put up over 200 yards in a day and our offense still looks lost it’s time to discuss the real issue. You force Cam to be one dimensional and everything else follows suit. 

 

If we are going to compete this year we are going to need Cam’s arm AND legs to be efficient. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChrisSimmsspleen said:

We should just lock a thread that says place your Cam excuses here.   

Wasn’t making it excuse. I’m calling it for what it is. He “played QB” well today but he wasn’t Cam Newton which is who we need him to be. Getting healthy comes first though and while the shoulder is still debatable I can reassure you that his foot isn’t ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not yet convinced Cam is done.  However, to speak directly to the points in this thread . . . you cannot have it both ways.  Let's assume for a moment that Cam is 2015 Cam again.  I do not believe this to be a good assumption, but let's run with it for just a sec.

If you want to run a scheme that features Cam running and throwing a la 2015, you are taking the ball out of CMC's hands.  I think that's a massive mistake.  CMC is a much better runner than Cam.  But creating a scheme like what we had in 2015 takes the ball out of CMC's hands, and it is not even the kind of matchup scheme that we're using to get CMC isolated and into space.

I still haven't seen Cam cut loose with the ball down field.  He is clearly better than last year in terms of where his arm is, but is he really capable of hurting an opponent deep?  I haven't seen it yet.

Again, one game does not tell us what we need to know.  Maybe the defense didn't give that to him.  Maybe Norv didn't call it.  I'm just saying, if you are an opponent, you'd be crazy not to challenge Cam to beat you deep.  In which case, I'd expect us to take advantage of that if Cam is truly capable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Not worried about it after 1 game coming off an injury

This is something that has potential to ripple deeper into the season if it lingers.

We can’t continue to have CMC be our leading rusher and receiver game after game and expect to be anything but one dimensional. Teams will have us figured out by week 3 if they haven’t already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...