Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another shitty offensive performance


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Cam missed several opportunities with off-throws and especially under throws. Norv Turner has turned us into patsies that get smacked in the mouth as opposed to do the smacking. We're a little bit of a train wreck on the offensive side of the ball. Sure, the O-line ain't perfect, but when people weren't getting blown up or blowing assignments, Cam still missed some easy-ish throws.

The defense certainly did enough to win, again. It's amazing it held up as much as it did with the offense unable to sufficiently sustain drives.

This is sad. Sad, I tell ya. This is NOT Panthers football. I don't feel especially good when we have the ball. It just seems like a disjointed offensive engine that is not firing on all cylinders.

Cam has lost his swag, and that realization has been a long time coming.

Honestly, I don't know what to do. A change is needed somewhere. We don't look even remotely like a team that can win much of anything at the moment, and I don't see any light at the end of the tunnel.

fuging trick play at the goal line! Even in down years, we always punched that in like taking candy from a baby! Got damn! Where the fug is our power run game? Put a fuging hoss in, boss! fuging straw boss!

And, one more thing, Ray-Ray would be sent out on the next puddle jumper if it were up to me!

/End rant

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Bowles just gave anybody who's paying attention a blueprint for how to beat us.

If we can't get somebody other than McCaffrey and an occasional Greg Olsen going, we're not going anywhere this year.

Agreed - if your QB can't hit WRs in tight windows or downfield, you can't win. Our offense is CMC. Take him away, you shut the offense down. Our receivers are not game changers, they require well placed throws to be effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this coaching staff even practice blitz pick up, maybe I’m watching a different game but cam made the right decisions, it’s just protection didn’t hold up long enough to make the big play.Now he didn’t miss throws even when protection was good but I’ll be damn if the game plan look like straight ass, we scared to throw screens or something ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, jimfear said:

Agreed - if your QB can't hit WRs in tight windows or downfield, you can't win. Our offense is CMC. Take him away, you shut the offense down. Our receivers are not game changers, they require well placed throws to be effective.

Bullshit. Are we actually going to blame Moore, and especially Samuel when Cam missed them long, missed them short,for just fuging missed them?  

Some of you are just blind. Damned right a QB needs the ability to throw in tight windows, and, more importantly, hit his receivers in stride sometimes. 

EVERY receiver is ALWAYS at fault with some Huddlers. ALL of them suck, and they NEVER get open. Come on, man. At some point the QB has to be able to make the throws on a consistent basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Bullshit. Are we actually going to blame Moore, and especially Samuel when Cam missed them long, missed them short,for just fuging missed them?  

Some of you are just blind. Damned right a QB needs the ability to throw in tight windows, and, more importantly, hit his receivers in stride sometimes. 

EVERY receiver is ALWAYS at fault with some Huddlers. ALL of them suck, and they NEVER get open. Come on, man. At some point the QB has to be able to make the throws on a consistent basis.

Hmm - maybe check my first sentence big guy. I said the QB needs to hit WRs in tight windows or downfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jimfear said:

Hmm - maybe check my first sentence big guy. I said the QB needs to hit WRs in tight windows or downfield.

Your last sentence kinda nullified the first. 

I've seen what Samuel and Moore can do. We all have. Hell, Samuel had a stretch last year where he was scoring TDs on relatively few touches. Moore led all receivers in total YAC. They scream "Play maker!" "Game changer!" Or, whatever you want to call it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Your last sentence kinda nullified the first. 

I've seen what Samuel and Moore can do. We all have. Hell, Samuel had a stretch last year where he was scoring TDs on relatively few touches. Moore led all receivers in total YAC. They scream "Play maker!" 

Yeah... not exactly. Do you think Moore and Samuel are in the same class as Hopkins, Julio, and pre-crazy AB? If your answer is no, then I wouldn't call them game changers. I'd say they need a good QB to help them out. I'm essentially agreeing with you, but it seems you want to argue. Are you DJ's mom?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jimfear said:

Yeah... not exactly. Do you think Moore and Samuel are in the same class as Hopkins, Julio, and pre-crazy AB? If your answer is no, then I wouldn't call them game changers. I'd say they need a good QB to help them out. I'm essentially agreeing with you, but it seems you want to argue. Are you DJ's mom?

No receiver is going to excel if a QB can't get him the ball, I don't care who he is. Most teams don't have a Julio, AB or Hopkins. Brady, Brees, etc. would love to have Moore and/or Samuel. The QB-WR connection is symbiotic. They both help each other to succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I've seen what Samuel and Moore can do. We all have. Hell, Samuel had a stretch last year where he was scoring TDs on relatively few touches. Moore led all receivers in total YAC. They scream "Play maker!" "Game changer!" Or, whatever you want to call it.

I've seen what Moore can do way more frequently on gadget plays than I have actual passes.

Not saying he can't be a great receiver but was noticeable last year how often we got the ball in his hands via handoff rather than pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, jimfear said:

Yeah... not exactly. Do you think Moore and Samuel are in the same class as Hopkins, Julio, and pre-crazy AB? If your answer is no, then I wouldn't call them game changers. I'd say they need a good QB to help them out. I'm essentially agreeing with you, but it seems you want to argue. Are you DJ's mom?

All those QBs routinely get them the ball in front of them, not behind where they have to stop and turn around. Do you understand the concept of momentum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jimfear said:

Hmm - maybe check my first sentence big guy. I said the QB needs to hit WRs in tight windows or downfield.

How about just hitting the receivers short? I've watched most of the games over the past 2 weeks, and Cam is in the top 3 poorest performers at QB that I've seen so far. This is not the Cam Newton of old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll tell you the one thing tonight that probably annoyed the living hell out of me more than anything else...

As the game wore on, it started to feel like every drive, we'd start off with a big play. We all saw the ball go way downfield and screamed "hell yeah, here we go"

And then we'd sit and watch almost every other play after that look like refried walrus ass :poison:

That was just damn frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Raptors blown out by Phoenix. Man this final stretch is gonna be crazy. Seeds 5-10 in the east are separated by 2.5 games… Hawks only team “hotter” than us, and I think they’re bound to come back down to earth with a pretty tough schedule to close out the season. We have some tough games too but ones that I think are very winnable, and still some very very easy games — which we have been winning consistently in 2026. Don’t think we’ve had a bad loss against a team we should beat since the Pacers in either very early January or late December
    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
×
×
  • Create New...