Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Season over after 2 games ?


Jens

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to stay optimistic. I dont think so, but we need to make adjustments, obviously.

We started 0-2 in 2013. Then 1-3 thru week4. We lost to the 9ers in divisional game that year. Krapernick making the crucial 4th down td run for the win. 

Our D got it together after first quarter of the season.

I may be in the minority, but we can turn this poo around with the talent we have. It all hinges on cam, the D, and ron/norv getting their poo together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GolfRasta said:

I'm trying to stay optimistic. I dont think so, but we need to make adjustments, obviously.

We started 0-2 in 2013. Then 1-3 thru week4. We lost to the 9ers in divisional game that year. Krapernick making the crucial 4th down td run for the win. 

Our D got it together after first quarter of the season.

I may be in the minority, but we can turn this poo around with the talent we have. It all hinges on cam, the D, and ron/norv getting their poo together.

I like your optimism. We need a win against the Cardinals though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fantasy is over, not the season. Waiting for us to adapt is not exciting, it's not our strong point. Cam can still improve but he won't if he is being teed off on from bad oline play. The D looks ok and would improve with more O sucess and converting 3rd downs more often. I still think we could be a solid tondangerous team. Dont see a SB team. If Can doesn't improve, the year is sunk. We need to do anything possible to provide him with time and options to play better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 332nd said:

Of course not. It is historically likely though.

I am afraid that you are right. Lets hope for a quick turnaround. I believe we have the players to do it unless the coaches have lost the locker room after only two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

The fantasy is over, not the season. Waiting for us to adapt is not exciting, it's not our strong point. Cam can still improve but he won't if he is being teed off on from bad oline play. The D looks ok and would improve with more O sucess and converting 3rd downs more often. I still think we could be a solid to dangerous team. Dont see a SB team. If Cam doesn't improve, the year is sunk. We need to do anything possible to provide him with time and options to play better.

Good take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on what happens to Cam and how long we wait to make a change if Cam doesn't get better. Honestly it looks like more than rust. He is all over the place with his throwing motion as is his accuracy. But it has been 8 games not 2. We are starting to mirror the definition of insanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...