Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting stats on Delhomme last year ...


E CaT PanTHer

Recommended Posts

First off, Delhomme has alreay exceeded his season total in INT's last year. He had 12 last year in 16 games, 13 already this year in 6 games.

Of the 16 games Delhomme started last year, only 3 games did he have a multi-interception game. The one @TB, he threw 3. The one @Oakland he threw 4 (surprisingly we still won), and the one against TB he threw 2. So that means in a total of 3 games, he had 9 out of the 12 interceptions he threw all year.

So in the other 13 games, Delhomme had 13 TD's, and 3 INT's. Yeah his TD total wasn't that high, but to throw only 3 INT's in 13 games is actually amazing. That's right along the Manning, Brady, and Rivers category when it comes to INT's. And of those 13 games, 10 of those games he didn't have a single INT.

So what ever happened to this Delhomme? Obviously that Arizona game played an even bigger part in his performance this year. Nothing has changed, our team is almost a mere image of the 2008 team. This Delhomme has to come back, and I think he will. Once he can get back to his old self, we're a playoff team, and I think we'll start seeing the change starting with Arizona this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the running game was a monster 13 games out of the season, that's why he had so few picks and INTs. he hardly had to throw the ball.

Not really. There's clearly something different about Delhomme since the Arizona game.

Last season: 1 int per 35 attempts

This season: 1 int per 14 attempts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's called "THE KNOCK". In any area of life, when you have the knock on ya, game over.

The Card's finally took all the film of Jake's tendenacies, foot work, signals and body language and coupled that with formations and that did it.

Every team so far this year has tried the same approach.

I will be very surprised if Jake plays the 2nd of this game Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

last year was a cup cake schedule. Otherwise he would have thrown 50 INTs.

They do shitty every other year, that way they get an easy schedule after doing poorly, pull out enough wins to keep their job, rinse and repeat.

Fox has this poo figured out. Do good every other year, show hope, get paid millions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do shitty every other year, that way they get an easy schedule after doing poorly, pull out enough wins to keep their job, rinse and repeat.

Fox has this poo figured out. Do good every other year, show hope, get paid millions.

Exactly! Fox will use Kemos injury as an excuse to keep his job knowing next years schedule will be easier so he can have some success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That should have been this year. Tough to sell to anyone worth getting when this crew is going into year 3 on the hot seat. I still think keeping Evero will sink them all after last year's showing. If/when he is scapegoated they need to show improvement or it's likely to be so eone else's problem next year. I do agree in principle tho, it all should have happened after last year's problems. 
    • I've listened to some things that have calmed the "Bryce was flat out terrible" to just "he was really bad" in Week 1. It's Year 3 though, and that shouldn't be the barometer. I've got 1% hope left for Bryce, and that's just blind homerism coming out.  I'm scared that as much emphasis as the team places on advanced stats and PFF that the team *doesn't* think Bryce was that bad in Week 1. Couple that with so many of the QBs in the league looking rough, offense being down in general, and I feel like there's a lot of "what if's" going on in the building instead of facing the music.  Lose Week 2, and we should switch the main focus back to building/churning the roster, evaluating young guys, and hoping our next QB can have a Jayden Daniels level of impact. As we're all well too aware of, QB is a crapshoot a lot of the time. Admit we made a bad pick, and go draft another. And another. Repeat until correct.     
    • I wouldn't want any of those starting as a rookie on day 1.  That said, we need a vet, that is not Andy Dalton, that can be the starter while a prospect grows and learns on the sidelines.
×
×
  • Create New...