Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Incredible... Wait, I meant "very good"


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If you recall Terrell McClain being a star for any team, you don't recall. McClain stuck around as depth on a couple of different teams. Evan Mathis did okay.

of course, invoking the name of Terrell McClain also brings up Sione Fua.

Evan Mathis made multiple pro bowls, he didnt just do 'okay'

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the mid to late rounds

Marty Hurney acquired 2 Hall of Famers (Steve Smith, Olsen), 4 Pro Bowlers (Norman, Hardy, Kalil, Mathis), and another guy that was a borderline pro bowler in Charles Johnson

if anyone else had that record, I can't imagine their irrational fan base would be crying about he's terrible outside the 1st round;  you can keep repeating the names of Clausen, Edwards, Gaulden, but it doesn't change the fact his bust rate in the mid rounds is no higher than any other general manager 

And in recent years, Dennis Daley, Donte Jackson, Ian Thomas, Christian Miller, and Haynes look very promising

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

And the several others that completely washed out of the league within two or three years?

(The overwhelming majority of the 2010 to 2012 draft classes, for example)

We can ignore all the good and only look at the bad for every single team in the league if we'd like.  

We can also only focus on all the good that happened and paint an entirely different picture.  The point is Hurney's average is right in line with about every other GM in the league.  

Now I'm not forgiving the clusterfug of the early 2010s where he got in the habit of trading away first round picks for second round picks, but I think we all know he's matured quite a bit since then.  All I'm saying is Hurney 2.0 is a million times better than his former self, and he is right in line with your average GM in the league.  It is ignorant and childish (not surprising with this fanbase) to say he has not been doing an acceptable job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Squirrel said:

That's is were I'm seeing this going.  Main reason I think Cam is done here.  The big money will be spent on the offensive and defensive line first.  We will have a QB that will be a game manager for the first few years. 

It's possible, who knows how it pans out. We are not privy to all the analyst of players and situations so it will be very interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

We can ignore all the good and only look at the bad for every single team in the league if we'd like.  

We can also only focus on all the good that happened and paint an entirely different picture.  The point is Hurney's average is right in line with about every other GM in the league.  

Now I'm not forgiving the clusterfug of the early 2010s where he got in the habit of trading away first round picks for second round picks, but I think we all know he's matured quite a bit since then.  All I'm saying is Hurney 2.0 is a million times better than his former self, and he is right in line with your average GM in the league.  It is ignorant and childish (not surprising with this fanbase) to say he has not been doing an acceptable job.

We don't have to just ignore one side. You absolutely should look at the whole picture.

The problem with the big picture is that there's more bad than good.

That's true even if you look solely at the drafting, but you shouldn't. You have to look at the entire roster building, and that's where the record comes in, and it ain't good either.

Has has been referenced many a time, the last time Marty Hurney was involved in building a roster that had a winning season was 2008. And his overall record on that front is 3 out of 14.

That's just not good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

And the several others that completely washed out of the league within two or three years?

(The overwhelming majority of the 2010 to 2012 draft classes, for example)

Find me literally one long time general manager whose mid to late round picks didn't mostly wash out of the league in a few years

Just one

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Mathis

Mathis was good enough for 94 career starts, none of which were for us even though we drafted him, 2 pro bowls and an all pro nod. If you’re making the argument that we draft players and then don’t develop them despite their talent, in my mind he is your prime example but to be fair I think all NFL teams have some of this going on. If it isn’t endemic I don’t get too worked up about it.

If Tepper really wants to get into analytics deep, I think an intriguing metric would be to develop a baseline for measuring achievement by players elsewhere after being cut by the team that drafted them. You could then measure your own team against this baseline as a tool for evaluating whether your coaching staff was recognizing and developing talent better or worse than the league as a whole.

I 100% agree with you that all NFL teams have quite a bit of just this going on.  That statement solidifies my argument that Hurney is batting a pretty "average" average.  The people flying off the handle around here talking about how much he sucks are being lazy with their analysis of what's going on with this team.  There is a ton of talent that continues to underperform on this team.  Poor scheme, poor player development.  People think a new GM is going to solve all the problems, but it absolutely isn't.

I love your second point about analyzing how players do on new teams after being drafted by others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bobowilson said:

Find me literally one long time general manager whose mid to late round picks didn't mostly wash out of the league in a few years

Just one

Take a look at how solid some of the recent Saints draft have been.

You're missing the point though. What's most important is overall roster building. You have to have the combination of drafting, free agency, trades, all of it.

Marty just isn't good enough at the big picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We don't have to just ignore one side. You absolutely should look at the whole picture.

The problem with the big picture is that there's more bad than good.

That's true even if you look solely at the drafting, but you shouldn't. You have to look at the entire roster building, and that's where the record comes in, and it ain't good either.

Has has been referenced many a time, the last time Marty Hurney was involved in building a roster that had a winning season was 2008. And his overall record on that front is 3 out of 14.

That's just not good enough.

The Panthers had a pretty darn good record with David Gettlemen as their GM.  

Are you attributing the success of the Panthers during that stretch to David Gettlemen?  I'm going to assume no, because you're a seemingly intelligent person.  David Gettlemen didn't wave a wand and make Josh Norman and Luke Kuechly pro bowlers.  He also didn't draft either of those players. 

By the same token, Marty Hurney is not responsible for the success of those players.  That would be the coach and his system.  A GMs job is to add talented players, which I feel Hurney 2.0 has done a good job of doing.  The coach's job is to get the most out of that talent, which I believe Rivera did for a while, but has failed to do recently for whatever reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Take a look at how solid some of the recent Saints draft have been.

You're missing the point though. What's most important is overall roster building. You have to have the combination of drafting, free agency, trades, all of it.

Marty just isn't good enough at the big picture.

Exactly. 

It doesn’t matter how good you are at drafting over the long term if poor negotiating and cap management means you don’t effectively retain the right talent at the right price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Exactly. 

It doesn’t matter how good you are at drafting over the long term if poor negotiating and cap management means you don’t effectively retain the right talent at the right price.

Yep. Which is why Tepper talking about putting Marty in a role best suited to his skills makes perfect sense.

(even if his skills aren't "incredible", just "very good")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what Tepper thinks of Hurneys 2.0's contract work? Is he happy with Palardis play and the hype before the season? It's kinda weird that a guy like Bradbury is playing good enough for an extension but there isnt a peep about it.

Time will tell. I'm waiting till after the draft to see how this shakes down. Ron wasn't getting fired and yet he was. Tepper has earned some goodwill and belief that he can get it done. And this 2.0 is still BS, same guy minus JR. Whoopdie freaking doo. Let's all celibrate and uphold mediocrity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

I wonder what Tepper thinks of Hurneys 2.0's contract work? Is he happy with Palardis play and the hype before the season? It's kinda weird that a guy like Bradbury is playing good enough for an extension but there isnt a peep about it.

Time will tell. I'm waiting till after the draft to see how this shakes down. Ron wasn't getting fired and yet he was. Tepper has earned some goodwill and belief that he can get it done. And this 2.0 is still BS, same guy minus JR. Whoopdie freaking doo. Let's all celibrate and uphold mediocrity.

you remember around 2007-2009 when ppl were putting the argument forth that hurney was great at contracts 

today it’s “he’s a great talent evaluator”

he needs to go if for no other reason than this forum’s grasp of reality so they can stop formulating stupid arguments to talk themselves into the concept that he’s actually any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

you remember around 2007-2009 when ppl were putting the argument forth that hurney was great at contracts 

today it’s “he’s a great talent evaluator”

he needs to go if for no other reason than this forum’s grasp of reality so they can stop formulating stupid arguments to talk themselves into the concept that he’s actually any good.

It would certainly be a mercy after what we Panthers fans have been through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Its completely and utterly bootlicking at this point.  If you cannot acknowledge that using 3 picks on a rb with a torn acl in the 2nd round isnt a bad pick then you simply havent a clue about football.  Sorry man it is what it is.  And its insanely laughable you are trying to strawman this argument using other players.  And what fuging facts are you bringing that is justifing morgan using 3 goddamn picks on him?  I cannot wait to hear that.
    • Scourton's interviews are telling to me that it's only a matter of time before he could really put it together.  His limitation tool-wise that I see is in his bend, but at the leaner size, it looks like it wasn't a problem at Purdue.   He has a good moveset and reads leverages very well (vet level well).  Plays both the speed/quickness (great change of direction) and has a power game with good hand usage.  Moves from what I've seen in my digs: I'm seeing cross-chop, fake crossers into bull, bull rush, spin (his preferred move of choice), hand shuck.  He's not unrefined by any means.   If he can do 2 things---I'm feeling confident from seeing his interviews that we have a real dude on our hands: 1) Diversifying his moveset/how it's deployed - Over-reliant on some, but again, he has a growing palette.  And is already great with his hands so things are in-place to coach up. 2) Developing a counter moveset and starting to play the chess game with an OT - He's very good at reading leverage, knowing when to change things up during a play.  But NFL coaching should start to teach him how to really create a plan based on an opponent.  What to throw at a guy first, how to confuse with fakes/counters, etc.  How to play against these tackles as a game progresses.   Overall, he has some things that give me serious optimism: Run Defense, speed moves, power moves, he's super young and has the size/length.  When you really spell it all out, I think we should get excited.  Temper expectations from a stat sheet standpoint, but he should be able to go in and make an impact.    
×
×
  • Create New...